Can $f(iA)$ be a unitary operator if $A$ is hermitian?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chris L T521
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the problem of determining whether the operator $f(iA)$, defined as $f(z)=\exp(z)$, is unitary when $A$ is a hermitian operator. It is established that if $A$ is an operator on a Hilbert space $\mathcal{H}$, then $f(iA)$ is indeed a unitary operator. The solution provided by Deveno confirms this conclusion, reinforcing the relationship between hermitian operators and unitary transformations in quantum mechanics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of hermitian operators in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with unitary operators and their properties
  • Knowledge of Taylor series expansion, specifically the exponential function
  • Basic concepts of Hilbert spaces in functional analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of unitary operators in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the implications of hermitian operators on quantum states
  • Learn about the spectral theorem for hermitian operators
  • Investigate the role of the exponential map in operator theory
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, mathematicians specializing in functional analysis, and students studying operator theory will benefit from this discussion.

Chris L T521
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
913
Reaction score
0
Here's this week's problem.

-----

Problem: If $f(z)=\exp(z)=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}z^n/n!$ and $A$ is a hermitian operator, show that $f(iA)$ is a unitary operator.

-----

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Update (additional info): After reading someone's solution to this problem, it became apparent that I didn't specify what space the operator $A$ was defined over; in fact, the text I took this question from didn't even specify the space. However, based on where this exercise was in the text, it's safe to assume that $A$ is an operator on any Hilbert space $\mathcal{H}$.
 
This week's question was correctly answered by Deveno. You can find his answer below.

Note that:$(iA)(-iA) = -(iA)^2 = (-iA)(iA)$

so that:

$f(iA)f(-iA) = \exp(iA)\exp(-iA) = \exp(iA-iA) = \exp(0) = A^0 = \text{id}$

that is:

$[f(iA)]^{-1} = f(-iA)$

now:

$[f(iA)]^H = [\exp(iA)]^H = \left[\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{(iA)^n}{n!}\right]^H = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{[(iA)^n]^H}{n!}$

$=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{[(iA)^H]^n}{n!} = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{(-iA^H)^n}{n!}$ (because $\overline{i} = -i$)

$= \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{(-iA)^n}{n!}$ (since $A$ is hermetian, $A = A^H$)

$= f(-iA) = [f(iA)]^{-1}$, so $f(iA)$ is unitary.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
882
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K