- #1

referframe

Gold Member

- 304

- 15

As always, thanks in advance.

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter referframe
- Start date

- #1

referframe

Gold Member

- 304

- 15

As always, thanks in advance.

- #2

- 13,033

- 588

Where did you read that and what was the reasoning ?

- #3

- 35,847

- 4,676

As always, thanks in advance.

We request that members who post something like this make exact reference to the source. This will force people, at least from now on, the

This is a perfect example, because what you describe is actually false. A free particle that is described by a plane wave solution to the Schrodinger equation, will have a well-defined momentum. Since for a free particle, the momentum and energy operators commute with each other, it means that the energy of that particle is also well-defined. Thus, this is equivalent to having a sharp energy value at a particular value - a delta function.

So now we are left with the question on whether (i) you read your source correctly, (ii) you read a dubious, faulty piece of information, or (iii) a number of other possible explanations. Without knowing the source of the information, we have no way of knowing.

Zz.

- #4

referframe

Gold Member

- 304

- 15

We request that members who post something like this make exact reference to the source. This will force people, at least from now on, thepay attention to the sourcethat they wish for us to address in the future.

This is a perfect example, because what you describe is actually false. A free particle that is described by a plane wave solution to the Schrodinger equation, will have a well-defined momentum. Since for a free particle, the momentum and energy operators commute with each other, it means that the energy of that particle is also well-defined. Thus, this is equivalent to having a sharp energy value at a particular value - a delta function.

So now we are left with the question on whether (i) you read your source correctly, (ii) you read a dubious, faulty piece of information, or (iii) a number of other possible explanations. Without knowing the source of the information, we have no way of knowing.

Zz.

I read it a couple of weeks ago. I will try to find the source. I think it was just somebody's paper that I ran into using Google. In any case, thanks for the clarification.

Share: