Can I bra through a Modulus in Quantum Mechanics?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter kq6up
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Modulus
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of bra-ket notation in quantum mechanics, specifically regarding the modulus of the sum of two ket vectors, ||V> + |W>. The user kq6up inquires whether it is valid to express the inner product + |W>| as | + |. The consensus is that one cannot take an inner product between a vector and a scalar, indicating that the proposed manipulation is incorrect. Understanding the basis and coefficients of the vectors involved is essential for proper application of these concepts.

PREREQUISITES
  • Familiarity with bra-ket notation in quantum mechanics
  • Understanding of inner products and their properties
  • Knowledge of vector spaces and basis vectors
  • Basic principles of quantum mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of inner products in Hilbert spaces
  • Learn about the significance of basis vectors in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the concept of vector modulus in quantum states
  • Investigate the implications of scalar multiplication in quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in quantum mechanics, physicists working with quantum states, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of quantum theory.

kq6up
Messages
366
Reaction score
13
If I have something like ||V>+|W>| That is the modulus of sum of two ket vectors, can I "bra" through the modulus like: <V|(||V>+|W>| )=|<V|V>+<V|W>|?

Thanks,
kq6up
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kq6up said:
||V>+|W>|
I have never heard of the modulus of a vector without knowing anything about the basis being used - at least you need to know the coefficients corresponding to each basis vector.
kq6up said:
can I "bra" through the modulus like: <V|(||V>+|W>| )=|<V|V>+<V|W>|?
You cannot take an inner product between a vector and a scalar.
 
When you put it as you did in your second line, it makes sense that my approach was wrong headed.

Thanks,
kq6up
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K