I Can I Differentiate Both Sides to Solve y in y^2=ln(1-y^2)?

NODARman
Messages
57
Reaction score
13
TL;DR
How can I find the extrema of the function?
Hi, I'm differentiating the "z" function to find extreme points but after solving the first partial derivatives with respect to "x" and "y" and also the "x" variable of the system, I can't find "y" (still in the system) using "ln" (natural logarithm).

The question is can I differentiate both sides and easily write what "y" is or I can't use that method to solve it?

The problem: y^2=ln(1-y^2)

This is how I've got here (picture):
 

Attachments

  • PXL_20221010_134956551_2.jpg
    PXL_20221010_134956551_2.jpg
    47.4 KB · Views: 182
Physics news on Phys.org
You have z = (x^2 + y^2)e^{-(x^2 + y^2)} - (x^2 + y^2). It would make sense here to use polar coordinates instead, and find the value of r at which z is maximal. This leads to <br /> 1 - r^2 = e^{r^2} which is what you obtained for y after concluding that x = 0.

Now by inspection r = 0 is a solution, and since the left hand side is less than 1 for r &gt; 0 and the right hand side is greater than 1 for r &gt; 0 the only solution is r = 0. Thus the extremum is at x = y = 0.

That one could be solved analytically, but in general equations of the form <br /> \mbox{(polynomial)} = \mbox{(exponential)} have to be solved numerically.
 
Last edited:
NODARman said:
The problem: y^2=ln(1-y^2)
You can solve this particular equation similarly to the way @pasmith did above for ##r##. The lefthand side is non-negative while the righthand side is non-positive. The only possible solution is when both sides equal 0, which is at ##y=0##.
 
I have the equation ##F^x=m\frac {d}{dt}(\gamma v^x)##, where ##\gamma## is the Lorentz factor, and ##x## is a superscript, not an exponent. In my textbook the solution is given as ##\frac {F^x}{m}t=\frac {v^x}{\sqrt {1-v^{x^2}/c^2}}##. What bothers me is, when I separate the variables I get ##\frac {F^x}{m}dt=d(\gamma v^x)##. Can I simply consider ##d(\gamma v^x)## the variable of integration without any further considerations? Can I simply make the substitution ##\gamma v^x = u## and then...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
869
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K