Can it be 2nd order non-linear diff. equation

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter teller
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    2nd order Non-linear
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the analysis of a second-order non-linear differential equation derived from the Lucas Washburn equation, which describes capillary rise. The equation is presented in two forms, with constants λ, ρ, F, and V, and initial conditions z(0)=0 and z'(0)=0. Participants conclude that the equation lacks an analytical solution in general, but numerical methods such as Euler's method, Runge Kutta, and Leapfrog can be employed for numerical integration. Special cases where constants a and c equal zero allow for solutions in terms of non-elementary functions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of second-order non-linear differential equations
  • Familiarity with the Lucas Washburn equation
  • Knowledge of numerical integration techniques such as Euler's method and Runge Kutta
  • Basic concepts of finite difference methods
NEXT STEPS
  • Research numerical integration techniques, focusing on Runge Kutta methods
  • Explore finite difference methods for solving differential equations
  • Study the implications of non-elementary functions in differential equations
  • Investigate the conditions under which second-order non-linear equations can be simplified
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineers dealing with differential equations, particularly those interested in numerical methods for solving complex non-linear systems.

teller
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hope I have posted this in the right section, this question is half differential equation and half finite difference method. The equation I have is a form of the Lucas Washburn equation, which is concerned with capillary rise:

[tex]\rho\left[\left(z+\lambda\right)z''_{tt}+(z'_{t})^{2}\right]+Vzz'_{t}+\rho g z=F[/tex]

[tex]\lambda,\rho[/tex], F & V are constants,initial conditions are z(0)=0, and z'(0)=0
The Equation in another form:

[tex]z\ddot{z}+\dot{z}^{2}=az\dot{z}+bz+c[/tex]

Am I correct in thinking that this differential equation has no analytical solution? In light of that I want to try and solve for z(t) numerically using a finite difference method but am unsure about how to reform this equation into a from I can use. Any thoughts or suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

Teller
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
...

Maybe I'm misunderstanding you, but you could use any numerical integration technique - Euler's method, Runge Kutta, Leapfrog, etc. - on the "another form" after solving for the highest-order derivative in terms of the others.

z'' = az' + b + c/z - z'*z'/z

then

z_(n+1) = z_(n) + z'_(n)*delta_t
z'_(n+1) = z'_(n) + z''_(n)*delta_t
z''_(n+1) = az'_(n+1) + b + c/z_(n+1) - z'_(n+1)*z'_(n+1)/z_(n+1)

No?
 
Surprisingly, the system is integrable as long as we have a = 0. The solution is not suitable for perturbation theory, however, since it must be given implicitly in terms of non-elementary functions.

If a = 0 and c = 0, then the unknown function can be solved for in terms non-elementary functions.

If a = 0 and b = 0 the solution is:

[tex]\sqrt{c t^2+2 c c_2 t-\frac{e^{2 c_1}}{c}+c c_2^2}[/tex]

I mention these special cases in case any of a,b,c are small perturbations, but it looks like in the general case the equation cannot be reduced to integration.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K