Can k(x) be Generated with Only One Rational Fraction?

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that the field k(x) of rational functions over a field k cannot be generated by a finite number of rational fractions. Specifically, it is established that any finite set of generators can only yield a finite number of irreducible factors in the denominators, which contradicts the infinite nature of irreducible polynomials in k(x). The proof involves demonstrating that if k(x) were generated by a single rational fraction, the resulting elements would have denominators with a limited number of irreducible factors, thus failing to encompass the entirety of k(x).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of rational functions and their properties
  • Familiarity with irreducible polynomials in field theory
  • Knowledge of algebraic structures, specifically k-algebras
  • Basic proof techniques in abstract algebra
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of finitely generated algebras in abstract algebra
  • Explore irreducible polynomials and their role in field extensions
  • Learn about the structure of rational function fields
  • Investigate examples of infinite-dimensional vector spaces over fields
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for algebraists, mathematicians studying field theory, and students seeking to understand the limitations of finitely generated algebras in the context of rational functions.

Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I would be grateful if someone could get me started on the following problem:

"Prove that the field k(x) of rational functions over k in the variable x is not a finitely generated k-algebra." (Dummit and Foote Chapter 15, page 668)

Peter

[This has also been posted on MHF]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hint: Any finite set of generators of $k(x)$ only produce a finite number of irreducible factors in the denominators.
 
Fernando Revilla said:
Hint: Any finite set of generators of $k(x)$ only produce a finite number of irreducible factors in the denominators.

Thanks Fernando.

My apologies ... I need a little more help ... Can you start me on the formal proof ..

I also need some help as to why irreducible elements enter the picture ...

Peter
 
This is the idea: suppose for example that $k(x)$ is generated by only one $p_1(x)/q_1(x)\in k(x).$ This means that $k(x)=k\left[p_1(x)/q_1(x)\right].$ But the elements of $k\left[p_1(x)/q_1(x)\right]$ have the form
$$a_n\left(\dfrac{p_1(x)}{q_1(x)}\right)^n+\ldots+a_1\dfrac{p_1(x)}{q_1(x)}+a_0=\dfrac{p(x)}{\left(q_1(x)\right)^n}\quad (a_i\in k,\;p(x)\in k[x])$$
The denominator has a finite number of irreducible factors. This means that we can't generate $k(x)$ with only one rational fraction (the number of irreducible plolynomials in $k(x)$ is infinite). Try to generalize to any finite number of generators.
 
Fernando Revilla said:
This is the idea: suppose for example that $k(x)$ is generated by only one $p_1(x)/q_1(x)\in k(x).$ This means that $k(x)=k\left[p_1(x)/q_1(x)\right].$ But the elements of $k\left[p_1(x)/q_1(x)\right]$ have the form
$$a_n\left(\dfrac{p_1(x)}{q_1(x)}\right)^n+\ldots+a_1\dfrac{p_1(x)}{q_1(x)}+a_0=\dfrac{p(x)}{\left(q_1(x)\right)^n}\quad (a_i\in k,\;p(x)\in k[x])$$
The denominator has a finite number of irreducible factors. This means that we can't generate $k(x)$ with only one rational fraction (the number of irreducible plolynomials in $k(x)$ is infinite). Try to generalize to any finite number of generators.

Thanks Fernando, I appreciate your help.

Peter
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K