Can k[x1,...,xn] be Isomorphically Mapped to k[x1]⊗k⋯⊗k[xn]?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Euge
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    2015
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the isomorphism between the polynomial ring k[x1,...,xn] and the tensor product k[x1]⊗k⋯⊗k[xn]. It establishes that for a given field k and indeterminates x1 through xn, there exists a definitive isomorphism represented as k[x1,...,xn] ≈ k[x1]⊗k⋯⊗k[xn]. This conclusion is crucial for understanding the structural properties of polynomial rings and their relationships with tensor products in algebra.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of polynomial rings, specifically k[x1,...,xn].
  • Familiarity with tensor products, particularly k[x1]⊗k⋯⊗k[xn].
  • Basic knowledge of field theory and indeterminates.
  • Proficiency in algebraic structures and isomorphisms.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of polynomial rings in algebra.
  • Explore tensor products in depth, focusing on their applications in algebra.
  • Investigate the concept of isomorphisms in algebraic structures.
  • Review examples of isomorphic mappings in polynomial and tensor product contexts.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, algebraists, and students studying abstract algebra, particularly those interested in polynomial rings and tensor products.

Euge
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
2,072
Reaction score
245
Here is this week's POTW:

-----
Let $k$ be a field, and $x_1,\ldots, x_n$ indeterminates. Show that there is an isomorphism

$$k[x_1,\ldots, x_n] \approx k[x_1]\otimes_k \cdots \otimes_k k[x_n].$$
-----Remember to read the http://www.mathhelpboards.com/showthread.php?772-Problem-of-the-Week-%28POTW%29-Procedure-and-Guidelines to find out how to http://www.mathhelpboards.com/forms.php?do=form&fid=2!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No one answered this week's problem. You can read my solution below.

There is a $k$-multilinear map $\Phi : k[x_1]\times \cdots \times k[x_n] \to k[x_1,\ldots, x_n]$ given by $\Phi(f_1(x_1),\ldots, f_n(x_n)) = f_1(x_1)\cdots f_n(x_n)$. So $\Phi$ induces a $k$-linear map $F : k[x_1]\otimes_R \cdots \otimes_R k[x_n]$ such that $F(f_1(x_1)\otimes\cdots \otimes f_n(x_n)) = f_1(x_1)\cdots f_n(x_n)$. The map $G : k[x_1,\ldots, x_n] \to k[x_1]\otimes_k \cdots \otimes_k k[x_n]$ be defined by setting

$$G(\sum_{i_1,\ldots i_n} a_{i_1,\ldots, i_n}x_1^{i_1}\cdots x_n^{i_n}) = \sum_{i_1,\ldots, i_n} a_{i_1,\ldots, i_n} x_1^{i_1}\otimes \cdots \otimes x_n^{i_n}.$$

Then $GF$ is the identity on $k[x_1]\otimes_k \cdots \otimes_k k[x_n]$ and $FG$ is the identity on $k[x_1,\ldots, x_n]$. So $F$ is invertible, and hence $F$ is an isomorphism.

In general, if $R$ is a commutative ring, then there is an $R$-algebra isomorphism of $R[x_1,\ldots, x_n]$ onto $R[x_1]\otimes_R \cdots \otimes_R R[x_n]$.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K