Can MRI Fringe Fields be Mapped in a 3D Space?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on mapping the fringe magnetic fields of MRI machines in a 3D space. The user intends to measure the field in a plane parallel to the machine's radius and assumes axisymmetry for the mapping process. However, participants emphasize that actual MRI systems may not be perfectly axisymmetric due to structural influences and recommend consulting the MRI Compatibility Data in the manuals for detailed field maps. They also suggest that while the axisymmetric approximation is useful, a comprehensive mapping approach is necessary to account for deviations caused by nearby ferrous materials.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of MRI machine operation and magnetic field principles
  • Familiarity with 3D spatial mapping techniques
  • Knowledge of magnetic field measurement tools and methods
  • Experience with data analysis and interpretation of field maps
NEXT STEPS
  • Research methods for measuring magnetic fields in 3D, such as using Hall effect sensors
  • Explore the use of finite element analysis (FEA) for simulating magnetic fields
  • Investigate the impact of nearby ferrous materials on magnetic field measurements
  • Learn about the MRI Compatibility Data and how to interpret it for field mapping
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, physicists, and researchers involved in MRI technology, magnetic field mapping, and safety assessments in medical imaging environments.

arashazizi
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hello everybody, I am working on a project that require to have map of an MRI machine fringe field in 3d space. I basic idea is to measur it in one plane parallel to radius of machine and then by assuming that field is axissymetric make my map. does anybody have any idea on doing that or on my work?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The manufacturers of MRI machines are required to publish various field maps in their official documentation. Why don't you just use the published maps?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: arashazizi
Thanks, but they just publish safe zone around machine and in Cartesian plans. I am going to use fringe field for navigation purpose and I need to have a more exact map of magnetic field in proximity of machine. the gradient in this region is bigger than inside the machine and also we have more freedom there.
 
They publish quite detailed plots of the field, the field gradient, and sometimes other quantities also.

The distance of the 5 Gauss line is often published in the marketing material. I think that is what you are talking about, but the actual system documentation and manuals contain much more detailed maps.

Look for the MRI Compatibility Data portion of the manual.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: arashazizi
Why would you think the fringe field is axisymmetric when the MIR machine is not - for example, it is supported on the bottom, but not on the top. Furthermore, if you are going to the trouble of measuring the field, why not measure it everywhere?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: arashazizi
The main field producing elements are axisymmetric, so it is a pretty good approximation. But you are right that there are slight deviations from axisymmetric. Particularly if the room has steel structural members.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: arashazizi
Inside the bore, the symmetry is good. But outside, all bets are off. Particularly if there is little or no iron for the return flux (common in these magnets) and, like you say, something ferrous in the room.

If you've ever mapped a magnet, you'll know that the vast majority of the time is in setup. Once you get going, it's pretty quick - so more points is the way to go for sure.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: arashazizi
I do agree with that. I would either use the published plots or I would do a full mapping.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: arashazizi
Your comments made my way more clear. I appreciate your guidance.
 
  • #10
arashazizi said:
Hello everybody, I am working on a project that require to have map of an MRI machine fringe field in 3d space. I basic idea is to measur it in one plane parallel to radius of machine and then by assuming that field is axissymetric make my map. does anybody have any idea on doing that or on my work?

I'm confused- are you asking how to measure the magnetic field in a plane, or are you asking how to make the planar measurement axisymmetric?
 
  • #11
My aim is to have a spatial measurement of fringe magnetic field in a 1^3 cubic space. If I want to have a 1 cm resolution I would have to take 10^3 measurement on exact points. I believe simulation does not work hear because geometry and all sources of uncertainty. I thought that if I take measures in a plane and then extend it to a cylindrical space I would have the map but distortion and lots of cables and other stuff around the machine make this assumption wrong.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
800
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
856
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
853
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K