selfAdjoint
Staff Emeritus
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
- 6,843
- 11
Grogs said:Unfortunately, the US wouldn't be fighting the NK's on an open field. The Korean peninsula is composed largely of mountains and rice paddies. An attack during the rainy season (when the rice paddies are flooded) would confine US tanks and HMMWV's to a few main north-south roads (Highway 1 and a few others.) Since the NK forces aren't nearly as mechanized as the US/ROK forces in the south, this would be a huge advantage for them.
Finally, some hard sense on this topic. In 1953 the US had great arms superiority over the NK/Chinese; their troops were armed mainly with burp guns that wouldn't shoot straight, their artillery wis inaccurate and of limited range, and they used ponies for logistics. To top it off we had absolute command of the air over the battlefield. Yet they bogged us down and we were unable to take their capital. Read up on the Iron Triangle. Why? Those mountains frustrated our mechanized supply and the tanks and trucks couldn't make it up those rugged hillsides, and we ended up using GIs as pack animals (we could have used some ponies!). And the enemy were thoroughly dug in in interlocking tunnels and bunkers. To attack them was to walk into concentrated machine gun fire. World War I trench warfare all over again.
The People's Republic of North Korea has had fifty years to elaborate and enhance those emplacements. They are great diggers, as their frequently discovered tunnels across the demilitarized zone attest. Bradleys and Strykers aren't going to be any help. You're going to see the mightiest army in history bogged down again.
*rubs eyes, squints, reads again*