The discussion revolves around the concept of prophecy and its potential conflict with the principles of quantum mechanics. Participants explore the implications of predicting the future within the framework of quantum theory, which posits that future states of systems are probabilistic rather than deterministic.
Participants generally disagree on the validity of prophetic claims and their compatibility with quantum mechanics, with no consensus reached on the matter.
Some statements reflect personal opinions and anecdotal references rather than established scientific consensus, and there is a lack of clarity regarding the definitions of terms like "prophecy" and "quantum mechanics" as used in the discussion.
CompuChip said:If you want my opinion, those people should be violating a lot more laws than they do anyway. Especially the kind that used "physical" arguments to support their gibberish ("your energy spectrum is distorted, but if you give me $ 300 I will resonate your eigenfrequency so that you may pass into a higher spacetime dimension" - *puke*).
CompuChip said:If you want my opinion, those people should be violating a lot more laws than they do anyway. Especially the kind that used "physical" arguments to support their gibberish ("your energy spectrum is distorted, but if you give me $ 300 I will resonate your eigenfrequency so that you may pass into a higher spacetime dimension" - *puke*).
Karl G. said:I've always wondered that when people claim to predict the future, don't they violate the laws of quantum mechanics? QM says that the state of a future system cannot be known (as it could be for classical physics), but can only be subject to the laws of probability.