Can Radiation Losses Be Recovered in Nuclear Fusion for Net Power Gain?

  • Thread starter Thread starter TESL@
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Loss Radiation
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the significant challenge of radiation losses in nuclear fusion, particularly in the context of achieving net power gain. Participants highlight that companies like Tri-Alpha Energy and LPP are exploring methods to recover these losses, especially in p-B fusion, which requires extremely high temperatures. The conversation emphasizes the need for effective energy capture strategies, as 80% of energy in D-T plasma is lost through neutron radiation, with the remaining 20% lost through conduction, convection, and radiation. The potential of using electron cyclotron waves and ICRH for energy recovery is also debated.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of nuclear fusion concepts, particularly D-T and p-B fusion.
  • Familiarity with radiation loss mechanisms in plasma physics.
  • Knowledge of energy recovery methods such as electron cyclotron resonance heating (ECRH) and ion cyclotron resonance heating (ICRH).
  • Basic principles of bremsstrahlung radiation and its implications in high-temperature plasmas.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the latest advancements in electron cyclotron wave energy recovery techniques.
  • Explore the implications of bremsstrahlung radiation on p-B fusion efficiency.
  • Investigate the role of turbulence in heat loss in tokamaks and stellarators.
  • Study the energy capture methods employed by Tri-Alpha Energy and LPP in their fusion experiments.
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, engineers, and physicists involved in nuclear fusion technology, particularly those focused on improving energy efficiency and addressing radiation loss challenges in fusion reactors.

TESL@
Messages
122
Reaction score
8
Hello,

After researching on many kinds of confinement methods and most promising reactions, (aneutronic fusion etc.) I saw almost every paper complained about radiation losses as the greatest problem preventing net power gain. And except Tri-Alpha Energy and LPP (Dense Plasma Focus) companies, nobody seems to be caring about recovering these losses. Since degenerate plasma is not practical aside from inertial confinement, the radiation must either be harvested or sent back to the plasma. So, why don't they just generate electricity from electron cyclotron waves by a rectenna array, and in return heat the ions by ICRH? What about bremsstrahlung? Is there no possibility but inefficient photoelectric converters?

Thank you.
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
TESL@ said:
So, why don't they just generate electricity from electron cyclotron waves by a rectenna array
The radiation is not coherent, and I don't think radio waves make up a significant part of the emitted power.

The harsh radiation and temperature conditions also limit the number of things you can place next to the plasma. It is hard enough to find some material for the first wall, even without additional functionality.
 
TESL@ said:
After researching on many kinds of confinement methods and most promising reactions, (aneutronic fusion etc.) I saw almost every paper complained about radiation losses as the greatest problem preventing net power gain. And except Tri-Alpha Energy and LPP (Dense Plasma Focus) companies, nobody seems to be caring about recovering these losses. Since degenerate plasma is not practical aside from inertial confinement, the radiation must either be harvested or sent back to the plasma. So, why don't they just generate electricity from electron cyclotron waves by a rectenna array, and in return heat the ions by ICRH? What about bremsstrahlung? Is there no possibility but inefficient photoelectric converters?
Both Tri-alpha and Lpp are interested in p-B fusion. p-B fusion requires orders of magnitude hotter temperatures than D-T fusion. The power radiated by Bremsstrahlung increases with both temperature and ion charge. For p-B fusion Bremsstrahlung is a potential show stopper for p-B fusion. Its a huge issue!

In a burning D-T plasma, 80% of the energy is lost via the neutron. This is the lions share of the energy, and the focus should be on capturing this energy efficiently (neutrons are also important because they are used to breed tritium). The remaining 20% of the energy is lost via various conduction, convection, and radiation mechanisms. I expect that various turbulant losses will dominate the remaining 20%. Turbulance dominates the heat loss in modern high performance tokamaks and stellarators.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K