Can RPT Machines Be Upgraded with Low-Cost Laser Technology for 3D Printing?

  • Thread starter Thread starter makethings
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    3d
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the potential for upgrading rapid prototyping (RPT) machines, such as RepRap and Fab@Home, with low-cost laser technology for 3D printing. Participants explore the feasibility of using lasers in stereolithography and the associated challenges, including material properties and cost considerations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether RPT machines can be outfitted with a laser similar to those in home/office printers for stereolithography, seeking information on the necessary wattage and cost-effectiveness.
  • Another participant raises concerns about the laser curing process, noting that lasers typically cure material in a straight line, which may complicate the printing process. They suggest that a system with multiple low-power lasers might be needed, but caution that the chemistry involved could be complex.
  • A different participant expresses uncertainty about the materials used in home SLA machines, questioning whether they utilize a powder with a binder and if those materials are curable with a laser.
  • Another contributor mentions that personal fabber machines primarily use fused deposition modeling with a polymorph substance and inquires about the minimal power requirements for a UV-activated liquid photopolymer laser technology.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus, as there are multiple competing views regarding the feasibility of using lasers in RPT machines and the specifics of the materials involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight potential limitations related to the chemistry of curing materials and the specific requirements for laser power, which remain unresolved.

makethings
Messages
93
Reaction score
0
Hi. I've been looking at RPT projects like reprap and fab@home whose aim is to provide a low cost solution to rapid prototyping. I was wondering if anyone with RPT experience could tell me if those machines could be outfitted with a laser (like what you might find in your typical home/office laser printer) and use a stereolithography to perform the printing.

I guess some things I want to find out are, like what wattage laser is needed to cure a vat of photopolymer to form a solid object. And is the cost reasonable to make a low cost 3d printer.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
The problem with a laser is that it goes in a straight line through the material and so would cure the full depth. You could imagine having a number of laser were the power for each was low so as to only trigger the cure where several beams intersected but the chemistry might be tricky.
I think most system rely on the cure only working with a comination of light (UV?) and air, so that the printer draws on the flat surface making an outline of that contour level which cures and then the model sinks slightly to give a new fresh surface.
 
I would have to do some background research on the "home versions." The SLA machines I am familiar with are nowhere near a home DIY set up. Don't they use some kind of powder with a binder, or am I dating myself with that?

Do you know off the top of your head what the media is that the home machines use? Is it even curable with a laser?
 
These personal fabber machines use fused deposition modelling as the technique. They use a polymorph stubstance as the material.

For curable laser technology, it would have to be some kind of UV activated liquid photopolymer, however, what kind of laser with the most minimal power (cheap cost) could do the job?
 

Similar threads

  • Sticky
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
13K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K