Can Science Answer All Important Human Questions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dekoi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Science
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the limitations of science in answering all significant human questions. Participants assert that while science is a powerful tool for understanding the natural universe, it is fundamentally a methodology rather than a source of absolute answers, especially regarding philosophical or theological inquiries. The efficiency of science is acknowledged, particularly in its advancements over the last century, yet the role of creation science is debated, with distinctions made between empirical science and faith-based approaches. Ultimately, the conversation emphasizes that science can address empirical questions but may not encompass all important human inquiries.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of scientific methodology
  • Familiarity with philosophical inquiry
  • Knowledge of empirical verification and falsification
  • Awareness of the distinction between secular and creation science
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the limitations of scientific inquiry in philosophy
  • Explore the role of empirical verification in scientific methods
  • Study the differences between secular science and creation science
  • Investigate the historical efficiency of scientific advancements
USEFUL FOR

Philosophers, scientists, educators, and anyone interested in the intersection of science, philosophy, and theology.

dekoi
What sort of inquiry is within the scope of science?
--------------

Can science hope to answer all the important questions humans are looking for answers to?
------------

Is Science 'efficient' ?
------------

Are creation scientists really scientists at all? Are they wasting their time in an arena that they simply can't hope to 'win' in?

-----------


Would be greatly interesting to see some of the subjective statements made by members. Thanks for being such good participants like always.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1. Scientific ones
2. define important
3 define efficient
4. is a dangerous question to ask, and possibly outside the remit of this forum.
 
science is a tool that allows us to understand our environment in the what, when, where, how, and why. the sharper that tool, the better we can understand it. it is possible that science can answer the unanswered philosophical questions of our modern time.
 
What sort of inquiry is within the scope of science?

Demonstrable inquiries. Speculation about how many angels can dance on the head of a pin is a theological and philosophical inquiry, not a scientific one.


--------------


Quote:
Can science hope to answer all the important questions humans are looking for answers to?

No, science is a philosophical method or tool, no different from logistics or semantics. Philosophy or theology may be able to answer such questions, but science is a method, not an answer or series of answers.

------------


Quote:
Is Science 'efficient' ?

Sometimes. Like any tool it can be used, abused, and neglected.


------------


Quote:
Are creation scientists really scientists at all? Are they wasting their time in an arena that they simply can't hope to 'win' in?

Again, science is a methodology for collecting and organizing data. Creation Science is a true science in this sense of the word, but is not a science in the sense of secular academic sciences which promote experimentation and objectivity.
 
Great answers. I'm glad i was able to post questions which only the most intelligent could answer in a valid way.

Thank you.
 
dekoi said:
What sort of inquiry is within the scope of science?

Science can address questions related to the natural universe, which are questions that have the potential of empirical verification or falsification. However, some metaphysical positions (e.g. naturalism) state that all that exists is the natural universe, and in this case any question is within the realm of science.

dekoi said:
Can science hope to answer all the important questions humans are looking for answers to?

What is an unimportant question? I have never known one. :smile:

dekoi said:
Is Science 'efficient' ?

If we consider scientific progress over the past 300 years in comparison with the rest of history and science's impact on technology, then, yes, science has been efficient, particularly during the last 100 years. Our ability to control the motion of invisible electrons has resulted in technology our ancestors would have deemed magical. It's exciting to think about where science and technology will be going in the next 100 years.

dekoi said:
Are creation scientists really scientists at all? Are they wasting their time in an arena that they simply can't hope to 'win' in?

This question is best asked in the religion section of the forum.
 
I appreciate the reply Artorius, although i have transferred by discussion about this topic to "The Scientific Method" posted by Glenn. See you there. :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
12K