Can Sealed Felony Charges Affect Teaching Opportunities?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rosebud
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the implications of sealed felony charges on teaching opportunities, particularly in the context of U.S. state laws and potential employment in education. Participants explore the challenges faced by individuals with felony records seeking teaching licenses and the legal complexities involved in expungement processes.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant shares their experience of pleading guilty to a felony drug charge at a young age and the subsequent sealing of the record, yet notes that it still appears in background checks, affecting their ability to obtain a teaching license.
  • Another participant suggests discussing the situation with potential employers, emphasizing the age of the individual at the time of the offense.
  • Some participants clarify that state laws generally prohibit certifying teachers with certain felony convictions, indicating that individual employers lack discretion in these matters.
  • One participant explains the broader consequences of felony convictions, including disqualifications from various professional licenses and civil rights, while referencing specific legal frameworks in Connecticut.
  • Concerns are raised about the effectiveness of hiring expensive lawyers for expungement, with skepticism about the likelihood of success based on the nature of the original charge.
  • There is a suggestion that teaching at private schools may be a viable option, as they may not be restricted to hiring only credentialed teachers.
  • Some participants advocate for pursuing the matter at the state level, arguing that the county court may not have the appropriate jurisdiction for expungement, and suggest an appeal process as a potential next step.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the feasibility of obtaining a teaching license with a felony record, with no consensus on the best course of action or the likelihood of success in expungement efforts. Multiple competing perspectives on legal options and employment opportunities remain evident.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexity of state laws regarding felony convictions and teaching certifications, as well as the potential for varying interpretations of jurisdiction in expungement cases. There is uncertainty regarding the specific legal pathways available and the implications of different types of felony charges.

Rosebud
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
I plead guilty to a felony drug charge when I was 18. The judge allowed me to enter drug court and since I successfully completed the required probation the charges were dropped and sealed. It doesn't matter that the record was sealed because the state conducts a BCA background check and the case shows up. I was not convicted of a felony but since I plead guilty it still shows that the verdict did not end in my favor.

I hired a lawyer to try and expunge the record but the county attorney fought it tooth and nail and was able to argue that the county court did not have the authority to expunge the case. My attorney wasn't able to prove otherwise. Therefore, I can't get a teaching license in my state (I live in the U.S.A.). Does anyone know if I can teach in certain states within the U.S. or other countries? I love Math and would like to teach it to others for a living.

Sounds like double jeopardy to me.

Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Possibly talk with your employer and explain the situation and your young age of 18 when it happened.
 
Fellowroot, it doesn't work like that. State laws prohibit certifying teachers that have committed certain crimes. Rosebud wants to know in which states, if any, do not have drug felonies on that list. Individual employers do not have discretion here.
 
"Double jeopardy" is the constitutional provision which keeps you from being prosecuted twice for the same offense. It does not prevent your punishment for a felony conviction from being limited to fines and/or probation or a term of incarceration.

A felony conviction comes with all sorts of attached disqualifications for various things, which is not 'double jeopardy':

1. Like you have found from personal experience, a felony conviction prevents you from getting a teaching certificate.
It also disqualifies one from being admitted to the bar or obtaining a medical license, or other professional license, or working in law enforcement or enlisting in military service without a special waiver, which are hard to get.
2. Your civil right to vote may also be suspended for varying periods, unless you petition to have it re-instated.
3. Your right to purchase or own a firearm is nullified.
4. Your right to serve on a jury is nullified.
5. You may find it hard, if not impossible, to get admitted to college.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loss_of_rights_due_to_felony_conviction

The following article shows how the laws of one state, Connecticut, weigh in on this issue:

http://www.cga.ct.gov/2012/rpt/2012-R-0252.htm

It's not clear what type of practice your attorney was in when he tried to get your conviction expunged, but you need to go about this process with the advice of a good criminal defense attorney, who are usually pretty expensive.
 
It's not clear what type of practice your attorney was in when he tried to get your conviction expunged, but you need to go about this process with the advice of a good criminal defense attorney, who are usually pretty expensive.

Just be wary, expensive lawyers are going to try to sell you their services, they will speak soothingly and probably oversell the likelihood that it'll work. I think there is little chance of it succeeding. It is not out of cruelty that I say this, it is my estimation of what the litigators will think of this case. If they expunge the record, there is then no record whatever, you can become a child psychologist or whatever. And probably your conviction was about "intent to distribute", so it's very easy for them to say, you could do it again, and school pupils are some of the most willing purchasers or users.

If it was auto theft or something like that, I would say there would be a good chance of clearing it. If it is merely possessing a small quantity of drugs, that could be argued in court as being not nefarious because it was merely personal. But if it is for intent to distribute, I think it won't happen, the argument I gave is too strong: what you stop you doing in again when the incentive is there?

One other thing, I think the only option is to fight this at the state level, to try to get it cleared. The county court must have seemed like a very important court but the response has been, this is not the right court. The federal system is not the right place either, they will merely assert that the state has the right to clear it and the fight should be taken up there. If it is worth fighting, it's worth fighting there only, at the highest state level available. Then they can't say, they don't have jurisdiction. What they can say is, no.
 
You might be able to get a job teaching at a private school which isn't restricted to hiring only credentialed teachers.
 
verty said:
One other thing, I think the only option is to fight this at the state level, to try to get it cleared. The county court must have seemed like a very important court but the response has been, this is not the right court. The federal system is not the right place either, they will merely assert that the state has the right to clear it and the fight should be taken up there. If it is worth fighting, it's worth fighting there only, at the highest state level available. Then they can't say, they don't have jurisdiction. What they can say is, no.

To the OP: Since the county attorney had successfully argued that the county court does not have jurisdiction to expunge your record, the logical next step would be to take this fight to the state courts (as verty has suggested) through an appeal process.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
7K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 116 ·
4
Replies
116
Views
22K
Replies
9
Views
14K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K