Can Shape Dynamics Be Tested Against Quantum Mechanics?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Shape Dynamics, which aligns with Mach's principles, is being evaluated for its compatibility with Quantum Mechanics. The discussion highlights the need for experimental methods to distinguish Shape Dynamics from other theoretical frameworks. A recommended introductory resource is the paper available at arXiv:1105.0183, and a notable talk by Gomez, a co-founder of the theory, is also mentioned as a valuable resource.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Mach's principles in physics
  • Familiarity with Quantum Mechanics concepts
  • Knowledge of theoretical physics frameworks
  • Ability to analyze scientific papers and talks
NEXT STEPS
  • Research experimental methods to test Shape Dynamics against Quantum Mechanics
  • Study Barbour's Shape Dynamics in detail through the provided arXiv paper
  • Watch Gomez's talk for insights on the foundational aspects of Shape Dynamics
  • Explore comparisons between Shape Dynamics and other theories in theoretical physics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, researchers in theoretical physics, and students interested in the intersection of Shape Dynamics and Quantum Mechanics will find this discussion beneficial.

lindberg
Messages
40
Reaction score
20
TL;DR
What would be some experiments that could falsify Barbour's Shape Dynamics?
Shape Dynamics implements nicely Mach's principles. But how well does it fare when it comes to Quantum Mechanics? How can it be experimentally distinguished from other theories?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you have a link explaining Barbour's Shape Dynamics?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ohwilleke
ohwilleke said:
Do you have a link explaining Barbour's Shape Dynamics?
I also really like this talk by Gomez, one of the founders:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2 and ohwilleke

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
9K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K