Can SinA > SinB Be Used to Prove A > B in Triangle Angles?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Michael_Light
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between the sine of angles and the angles themselves within the context of a triangle. Participants explore whether the condition sinA > sinB can be used to conclude that angle A is greater than angle B, considering the implications of angle restrictions in a triangle.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether sinA > sinB implies A > B for angles within a triangle, expressing uncertainty about the validity of this implication.
  • Another participant notes that if angles are restricted to between 0 and 180 degrees, the implication does not hold universally, but it may hold under certain conditions.
  • Some participants argue that if both angles are acute (between 0 and 90 degrees), then sinA > sinB does imply A > B, as the sine function is strictly increasing in that range.
  • There is a suggestion that if angle A is obtuse, the relationship may still hold due to the symmetry of the sine function around 90 degrees, although this requires careful consideration of the angle sum in a triangle.
  • One participant proposes a proof by contradiction to show that if sinA > sinB, then angle B must be acute, which could lead to further conclusions about the relationship between A and B.
  • Another participant clarifies that the implication does not work both ways in general, but under specific conditions related to the angles in a triangle, it may be valid.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether sinA > sinB can conclusively imply A > B, with some supporting the idea under specific conditions while others highlight counterexamples or limitations. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the general applicability of the implication.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the sine function's behavior varies depending on the range of angles considered, and the implications may differ for acute versus obtuse angles. The discussion also touches on the angle sum property of triangles, which adds complexity to the relationships being examined.

Michael_Light
Messages
112
Reaction score
0
I am in pre-u level, i apologize if i have asked something dumb but it bothers me a lot. :frown:

Here it goes my question: If A and B are angles inside a triangle, and sinA > sinB, can i conclude that A>B? If yes, how can we prove it? Can i use this argument in proving question?

Please guide me. :smile:
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Your restriction to "angles inside a triangle" means angles between 0 and 180 degrees (or 0 and pi radians).

Look at a graph of the sin function between 0 and 180 degrees, and you should be able to see why this is false.

If you restrict the range to between 0 and 90 degrees not 180, then it is true (that is also clear from looking at the graph).

Of course looking at a graph isn't really a "proof", but proving this rigorously needs math beyond what you have probably studied at pre-university level.
 
Can't we just find the derivative of sin A and see that it is always positive in (0,90), hence strictly increasing. That's something you have to study pre-university in Hong Kong.
 
dalcde said:
Can't we just find the derivative of sin A and see that it is always positive in (0,90), hence strictly increasing. That's something you have to study pre-university in Hong Kong.
That wouldn't help you in this case since angles in a triangle belong to the set [itex]\{\theta:0<\theta<\pi\}[/itex].
 
Michael_Light said:
I am in pre-u level, i apologize if i have asked something dumb but it bothers me a lot. :frown:

Here it goes my question: If A and B are angles inside a triangle, and sinA > sinB, can i conclude that A>B? If yes, how can we prove it? Can i use this argument in proving question?

Please guide me. :smile:

Yes, provided that A and B are angles within the same triangle, then A > B implies that sin(A) > sin(B).

It's easiest to consider the proof as two cases, one for A acute and another A obtuse.

Case 1. If the larger angle "A" is less than or equal pi/2 then the proof is obvious, since sin is an increasing function on [0..pi/2).

Case 2. If the larger angle "A" is greater then pi/2, say [itex]A = \pi/2 + \theta[/itex], then it follows from the angle sum of a triangle that, [itex]B < \pi/2 - \theta[/itex]. So from the symmetry of sin() about pi/2 we can conclude that the inequality sin(A) > sin(B) still holds.
 
Last edited:
Sorry I misread your question as :
- "does A > B in a triangle imply that sin(A) > sin(B)"

when you actually asked :
- "does sin(A) > sin(B) in a triangle imply that A > B"

Let me think for a minute if the implication goes both ways ...
 
Last edited:
Ok, the implication does indeed work the other way too. One way to prove this is to start by proving the following:

- if sinA > sinB (in a triangle) then B must be acute. After proving this, then the result you seek is very straight forward.

One way to prove the result about "B" being acute is by contradiction. Assume that [itex](\sin A>\sin B)[/itex] and that B is non-acute, say [itex]B = \pi/2 + \theta[/itex].

Since [itex]B = \pi/2 + \theta[/itex], then to satisfy the angle sum condition we require [itex]A < \pi/2 - \theta[/itex]. The symmetry of sin() about pi/2 then implies that sin(A) < sin(B), giving us the required contradiction.
 
Last edited:
Regarding AlephZero's response, it is true that just "sin(A)> sin(B)" does NOT imply "A> B", even if A and B are restricted to be between 0 and 180 degrees. However, for A and B two angles in a triangle, it is a different matter. It is true that if A> 90- x, B> 90+ x, then sin(A)> sin(B) while A> B. However, in that case, we have A+ B> 180 degrees so they cannot be two angles in a triangle.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K