I Can someone explain Quasi-steady-state cosmology to me?

AI Thread Summary
Quasi-steady-state cosmology posits an eternal universe where expansion is driven by a repulsive field and matter is continuously created to maintain a constant density. This model features pulsations between minimum and maximum radii, allowing for oscillations without full contractions to a singularity. The universe's current state reflects its past, adhering to the perfect cosmological principle, which states that the universe looks the same at all times and places. The discussion highlights the relationship between gravity and cosmic expansion, questioning why celestial bodies remain apart despite infinite time for attraction. For further understanding, a non-technical overview with historical context is available through a provided reference.
TheHeraclitus
Messages
14
Reaction score
1
TL;DR Summary
Why is it called "Quasi steady-state" and not just Steady state?
How does it account for expansion of the universe?
I know it says Universe is eternal, how does that work with gravity? If all the stars and galaxies had infinite time to attract each other why are they still apart? I guess this is a naïve question because no one talks about it but I can't figure it out.

Thank you for answers!
 
Space news on Phys.org
Can you give a reference for where you are getting your information about the quasi steady state model?
 
Basically, in steady-state there is exponential expansion driven by a repulsive field, and continuous creation of matter to keep the density of the universe constant.
In QSS there are pulsations between minimum and maximum radii (but not full contractions towards a singularity or near-singularity, and not necessarily simultaneously throughout the entire universe) with matter being created predominantly during the minima from the repulsive field.

In both cases the state of the universe today is representative of how it was for all time (i.e. the perfect cosmological principle - not only every place looks the same, but also every time). Although in the QSS case this condition is comparatively relaxed, with expansion->contraction->creation->expansion oscillations.

Good non-technical overview with lots of historical background:
https://arxiv.org/abs/1201.3449
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...
Back
Top