lioric
- 335
- 26
- TL;DR
- This is a question from a local exam paper.
I can see a huge error in the question
Can someone confirm this error.
The discussion revolves around identifying errors in a question related to hydrated copper sulfate, specifically focusing on mass calculations and the interpretation of the question in the context of a high school exam. Participants examine the implications of these errors on the understanding of the question and the correctness of the answers provided.
Participants generally agree that there are errors in the question, particularly regarding the mass in part d and the description of hydrated copper sulfate. However, there are differing views on the implications of these errors and the overall quality of the question.
Limitations include potential assumptions about the definitions of terms used in the question, the accuracy of the mass calculations, and the context in which the question was presented. The discussion does not resolve these issues.
TeethWhitener said:But yes, there seems to be an error in the mass in part d. I'm assuming that's what you were talking about.
Of course it's well written it was copied from an olevel paper. The teacher just changed the substance and masses.TeethWhitener said:I’m a bit surprised that the percent in part (e) they’d be interested in is a mass percent. If you convert the masses to moles, you find that there are 5 waters per CuSO4 molar unit, which is actually the case for hydrated copper sulfate. It’s a well-written question if you get rid of the mistakes.