MHB Can t-tests be used to compare ecological indices from different sampling sizes?

  • Thread starter Thread starter macedo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sampling
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on whether t-tests can be used to compare ecological indices derived from different sampling sizes in coastal dune vegetation. The data includes plant species occurrences from 30 sites with varying transect lengths, leading to 30 distinct ecological index values. The user seeks to compare two groups of beaches based on erosive conditions using these indices. Clarification is provided that the indices are species co-occurrence indices calculated from presence/absence data in 0.5 m segments. The main question remains whether the data should be standardized to a common transect length before applying the t-test for comparison.
macedo
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone

I would like that you may help me with this following question:

I have data from plant species occurrences from 30 sites (10 beaches with 3 replications for each one; 6 beaches not in erosive process; 4 in erosive process) in coastal dunes vegetation.
At each site I have made data collection along one transect (so all the 30 transects have different lengths and sometimes very different (namely between beaches), the smaller with 8 m and the bigger with 130 m).
I have calculated different ecological indices which gave me naturally 30 different values for each site.
Now, I grouped the 10 beaches in two groups (2 different environmental conditions: erosive beaches (12) and not erosive beaches (18)).
May I compare the two groups with all the data (with all the complete transects) with a t-Test or I have to previously to cut to a common length to all the 30 transects in order to compare statistically the data?
Thanks you for your attention
Sincerely
José A Macedo
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
macedo said:
Hello everyone

I would like that you may help me with this following question:

I have data from plant species occurrences from 30 sites (10 beaches with 3 replications for each one; 6 beaches not in erosive process; 4 in erosive process) in coastal dunes vegetation.
At each site I have made data collection along one transect (so all the 30 transects have different lengths and sometimes very different (namely between beaches), the smaller with 8 m and the bigger with 130 m).
I have calculated different ecological indices which gave me naturally 30 different values for each site.
Now, I grouped the 10 beaches in two groups (2 different environmental conditions: erosive beaches (12) and not erosive beaches (18)).
May I compare the two groups with all the data (with all the complete transects) with a t-Test or I have to previously to cut to a common length to all the 30 transects in order to compare statistically the data?
Thanks you for your attention
Sincerely
José A Macedo

I think we need to know what the nature of the indices are.

CB
 
hello
Thanks for the message. The indices are species co-occurrence indices (null models) calculated with presence/absence of species in each 0.5 m.
Thank you again
Jose
 
I have been insisting to my statistics students that for probabilities, the rule is the number of significant figures is the number of digits past the leading zeros or leading nines. For example to give 4 significant figures for a probability: 0.000001234 and 0.99999991234 are the correct number of decimal places. That way the complementary probability can also be given to the same significant figures ( 0.999998766 and 0.00000008766 respectively). More generally if you have a value that...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
11K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K