Can the Cross Product of a Vector Field and Its Conjugate Be a Gradient?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the possibility of representing the cross product of a vector field \(\vec{f}(x,y,z)\) and its conjugate \(\vec{f}^\ast(x,y,z)\) as the gradient of a scalar field \(\phi(x,y,z)\). The equation \(\vec{\nabla}\phi(x,y,z) = \vec{f}(x,y,z) \times \vec{f}^\ast(x,y,z)\) is examined for nontrivial solutions. It is established that for a potential function to exist, it must satisfy Laplace's equation, and the divergence of the derived formula should be calculated to gain insights. The discussion emphasizes the necessity of complex vector spaces and the condition \(f \neq f^\ast\).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector calculus, specifically cross products and gradients.
  • Familiarity with complex vector fields and their conjugates.
  • Knowledge of Laplace's equation and its implications for potential functions.
  • Ability to compute divergence in vector fields.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of complex vector fields in relation to gradients.
  • Learn how to derive and solve Laplace's equation in three dimensions.
  • Explore the implications of divergence in vector calculus.
  • Investigate the conditions under which a potential function exists in complex vector spaces.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and researchers in fields involving vector calculus and complex analysis, particularly those exploring potential functions and vector field interactions.

Mentia
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Is it possible to nontrivially represent the cross product of a vector field \vec{f}(x,y,z) with its conjugate as the gradient of some scalar field \phi(x,y,z)?

In other words, can the PDE

\vec{\nabla}\phi(x,y,z) = \vec{f}(x,y,z)\times\vec{f}^\ast(x,y,z)

be nontrivially (no constant field \vec{f}) solved?

If not, why? If so, can you give an example of such a scalar field? This problem has popped up in my research and I'm afraid my PDE skills are lacking.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If I remember correctly, you cannot take the cross product of two vector fields, you need the external product. It is difficult to otherwise define which vectors you are operating on.

Does your question stem from Laplace's equation?
 
Let \vec{f}(x,y,z)=f_x(x,y,z)\hat{x}+f_y(x,y,z)\hat{y}+f_z(x,y,z)\hat{z}. Then \vec{f}\times\vec{f}^\ast =(f_yf_z^\ast -f_y^\ast f_z)\hat{x}+(f_zf_x^\ast -f_z^\ast f_x)\hat{y}+(f_xf_y^\ast -f_x^\ast f_y)\hat{z}=2i\left [ \text{Im}(f_yf_z^\ast)\hat{x} + \text{Im}(f_zf_x^\ast)\hat{y} + \text{Im}(f_xf_y^\ast)\hat{z} \right ].

Does there exist a non-constant and necessarily complex \vec{f} for which there exists a \phi that satisfies \vec{\nabla}\phi=\vec{f}\times\vec{f}^\ast?
 
Last edited:
Hmmm, complex vector spaces, nice :approve:

Here's some tips that may help you: In order for a potential function to exist, it must satisfy Laplace's equation. Try calculating the divergence of the formula you derived and see whether it suggests something meaningful.

As for it being necessarily complex, the condition is that:

f\neq f^*

Try starting with the condition f=f^* in the divergence of \nabla φ. It should lead you to a non-true statement.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K