Can the Intriguing Harmonic Sum be Solved with Elementary Methods?

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter alyafey22
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Harmonic Sum
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The thread discusses the harmonic sum involving the squared harmonic numbers, specifically the sum $$\sum_{k\geq 1} \frac{H^2_k}{k^2}$$ and its potential resolution using elementary methods. Participants explore various mathematical approaches, including generating functions, integrals, and series manipulations, while referencing complex methods previously used in literature.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose proving the sum $$\sum_{k\geq 1} \frac{H^2_k}{k^2}=\frac{17}{4}\zeta(4)$$ using elementary methods rather than complex techniques like contour integration.
  • One participant suggests breaking down the sum $$\sum_{j = 1}^k \frac{1}{jk}$$ into partial sums as a potential approach to an inductive proof.
  • Another participant considers using the formula $$\psi_0^2(k+1) = (H_k -\gamma)^2$$ or solving a specific integral as part of their strategy.
  • Generating functions are introduced as a method to express the sums involving harmonic numbers, leading to complex expressions involving logarithms and polylogarithms.
  • Participants discuss integrating various logarithmic functions and their relationships to the harmonic sums, with some expressing uncertainty about the correctness of their approaches.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no consensus on a single method or approach to solve the harmonic sum, with multiple competing views and techniques being explored. Participants express uncertainty and seek clarification on various points, indicating an ongoing debate.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexity of the harmonic series and the lack of explicit formulas for its partial sums, which may limit the applicability of their proposed methods. There are also unresolved mathematical steps and dependencies on definitions that could affect the outcomes of their approaches.

alyafey22
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
1,556
Reaction score
2
This thread will be dedicated for a trial to prove the following

$$\sum_{k\geq 1} \frac{H^2_k}{k^2}=\frac{17}{4}\zeta(4)=\frac{17\pi^4}{360}$$

$$\mbox{where }\,\,H^2_k =\left( 1+\frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{3}+\cdots \frac{1}{k}\right)^2$$​

In this paper the authors give solutions to the sum and others , but the process is quite complicated and uses contour integration , Fourier series and Parseal's thoerem , ... .

I believe we can solve it using elementary methods .
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
ZaidAlyafey said:
This method will be dedicated for a trial to prove the following

$$\sum_{k\geq 1} \frac{H^2_k}{k^2}=\frac{17}{4}\zeta(4)=\frac{17\pi^4}{360}$$

$$\mbox{where }\,\,H^2_k =\left( 1+\frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{3}+\cdots \frac{1}{k}\right)^2$$​

In this paper the authors give solutions to the sum and others , but the process is quite complicated and uses contour integration , Fourier series and Parseal's thoerem , ... .

I believe we can solve it using elementary methods .
The harmonic series has no explicit formula for its partial sum. But we can possibly deal with the sum
[math]\sum_{j = 1}^k \frac{1}{jk}[/math]

I don't recognize the series, but if there is one and we can break it down into partial sums I think there might be an outside chance of an induction proof.

Possible do you think?

-Dan
 
I am thinking of using the formula

$$\psi_0^2(k+1) = (H_k -\gamma)^2$$

or possibly solving the integral

$$\left( \int^1_0 \frac{1-x^n}{1-x}\, dx \right)^2 $$
 
Last edited:
topsquark said:
The harmonic series has no explicit formula for its partial sum. But we can possibly deal with the sum
[math]\sum_{j = 1}^k \frac{1}{jk}[/math]

I don't recognize the series, but if there is one and we can break it down into partial sums I think there might be an outside chance of an induction proof.

Possible do you think?

-Dan
I don't possibly get your idea , could you elaborate ?
 
The "inner" sum (before we square it and take the sum of that) is the 1/jk summation. I was thinking if we could get an explicit formula for that in terms of k we might be able to get a partial sum expression to sum over the square of and proceed inductively. If it works the outer sum would still be nasty as all (Swear) to compute, but it might be a way forward.

-Dan

- - - Updated - - -

ZaidAlyafey said:
$$\left( \int^1_0 \frac{1-x^n}{1-x} \right)^2\, dx $$
There's a typo here. What integral is this?

-Dan
 
We can use the following generating function

$$\sum_{n\geq 1} H^2_n x^n = \frac{\log^2(1-x)+\operatorname{Li}_2(x)}{1-x}$$

$$\sum_{n\geq 1} H^2_n x^{n-1} = \frac{\log^2(1-x)}{1-x}+\frac{\log^2(1-x)}{x}+\frac{\operatorname{Li}_2(x)}{1-x}+\frac{\operatorname{Li}_2(x)}{x}$$

By integrating we get

$$\sum_{n\geq 1}\frac{ H^2_n }{n}x^{n} = -\frac{\log^3(1-x)}{3}+\int^x_0 \frac{\log^2(1-x)}{x}\, dx+\int^x_0 \frac{\operatorname{Li}_2(x)}{1-x}\, dx+\operatorname{Li}_3(x)$$

$$\int^{x}_0 \frac{\operatorname{Li}_2(x)}{1-x}\, dx= -\log(1-x) \operatorname{Li}_2(x)- \int^x_0 \frac{\log^2(1-x)}{x}$$

Hence we have

$$\sum_{n\geq 1}\frac{ H^2_n }{n}x^{n} = -\frac{\log^3(1-x)}{3}-\log(1-x) \operatorname{Li}_2(x)+\operatorname{Li}_3(x)$$

By integrating we get

$$\sum_{n\geq 1}\frac{ H^2_n }{n^2}x^{n} = -\frac{1}{3}\int^x_0 \frac{\log^3(1-x)}{x}\, dx+\frac{ \operatorname{Li}^2_2(x)}{2}+\operatorname{Li}_4(x)$$

Of course this a generalization of the harmonic sum , an attempt to solve the integral will be made later .
 
Let us solve

$$\int^x_0 \frac{\log^3(1-t)}{t}\, dt$$

If we start by parts we get

$$\int^x_0 \frac{\log^3(1-t)}{t}\, dt = \log^3(1-x)\log(x) +3 \int^x_0 \frac{\log^2(1-t) \log(t)}{1-t} \, dt $$

Integrating by parts again we get

$$\int^x_0 \frac{\log^3(1-t)}{t}\, dt = \log^3(1-x)\log(x) +3 \left(\log^2(1-x)\operatorname{Li}_2(1-x)+2 \int^x_0 \frac{\log(1-t) \operatorname{Li}_2(1-t)}{1-t} \right)$$

Simplifying we get

$$\int^x_0 \frac{\log^3(1-t)}{t}\, dt = \log^3(1-x)\log(x)+3 \log^2(1-x)\operatorname{Li}_2(1-x)+6 \int^x_0 \frac{\log(1-t) \operatorname{Li}_2(1-t)}{1-t}\, dt $$

By parts for the third time

$$\int^x_0 \frac{\log^3(1-t)}{t}\, dt = \log^3(1-x)\log(x)+3 \log^2(1-x)\operatorname{Li}_2(1-x)-6 \operatorname{Li}_3(1-x) \log(1-x) +6\operatorname{Li}_4(1-x) -6\zeta(4)$$
 
Last edited:
So that becomes

\begin{align}
\sum_ {n\geq 1}\frac{ H^2_n }{n^2}x^{n} &= \frac{\pi^4}{45}-\frac{1}{3}\log^3(1-x)\log(x)- \log^2(1-x)\operatorname{Li}_2(1-x)+2 \operatorname{Li}_3(1-x) \log(1-x) \\& \, -2\operatorname{Li}_4(1-x)+\frac{ \operatorname{Li}^2_2(x)}{2}+\operatorname{Li}_4(x )
\end{align}

Putting $x =1$ most of the terms will go BAAAA... m and we are left with

$$ \sum_{n\geq 1}\frac{ H^2_n }{n^2} =\frac{\pi^4}{45}+\frac{\zeta^{\, 2}(2)}{2}+\zeta(4)=\frac{\pi^4}{45}+ \frac{\pi^4}{72}+\frac{\pi^4}{90}=\frac{17 \pi^4}{360}$$

Wasn't that nice !
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K