Can there be a lawless universe (according to Hawking)?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on Stephen Hawking's views regarding the existence of multiple universes and the potential for universes without laws, as presented in his 2011 book "George and the Big Bang" co-authored with Lucy Hawking. A quote from the book suggests the possibility of universes with differing or absent laws, which raises questions about the nature of laws in the universe. The conversation references a Scientific American article where Hawking discusses black holes as "wells of forgetfulness," implying a loss of past information and challenging the notion of universal laws. The inquiry focuses on whether Hawking genuinely believed in lawless universes or if such statements were exaggerated for a younger audience.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Multiverse theory as proposed by Stephen Hawking
  • Familiarity with black hole physics and information loss
  • Knowledge of popular science literature and its impact on public perception
  • Awareness of the distinction between scientific speculation and peer-reviewed research
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Multiverse theory and its implications in modern physics
  • Explore the concept of information loss in black holes and its relevance to quantum mechanics
  • Read Stephen Hawking's peer-reviewed publications for a deeper understanding of his scientific claims
  • Investigate the role of popular science in shaping public understanding of complex scientific theories
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, science communicators, and anyone interested in the philosophical implications of Hawking's theories on the nature of the universe and laws of physics.

Suekdccia
Messages
352
Reaction score
30
TL;DR
Can there be a lawless universe (according to Stephen Hawking)?
I got a phrase from a book that Stephen Hawking and his daughter Lucy Hawking published in 2011. The book is "George and the Big Bang" which is a science fiction book prepared for children.
I read a phrase on that book that interested me. It was:

"Perhaps there are many universes, each with laws different from our own, and maybe some with no laws to speak of at all."

I thought that this was probably an exaggeration or something like that since the book is aimed for children. But in a recent article in the Scientific American (https://blogs.scientificamerican.co...universe-does-not-forget-and-neither-will-we/), he seems to imply that nature does not have laws at all:

"If black holes are “wells of forgetfulness,” as Hawking put it recently, in which the past is lost for good, can nature be said to have laws at all? “It’s like the universe losing its cell phone,” Hawking said. “Worse than that—losing its memory""

My main question is: It is known that Stephen Hawking was a proponent of the Multiverse hypotheses, but did he really think that even universes with no laws could exist? Or that was an exaggerated statement to impress the children that would read this book?
 
Space news on Phys.org
Hawking's pop science publications had a tendency to present far-out speculations of his in the same manner as well-tested physics. I am not aware of any actual peer-reviewed publication of his where he made claims like the ones you describe.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
14K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 81 ·
3
Replies
81
Views
17K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
14K