Can this be another reason for dark energy?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the misconception that dark energy may be the residual force from the Big Bang, suggesting that decreasing gravitational attraction leads to the observed acceleration of cosmic expansion. However, participants clarify that dark energy is a distinct phenomenon, responsible for the increasing acceleration of the universe's expansion, contrary to expectations of a gradual decrease in expansion rate. The current understanding is that dark energy emerged after the Big Bang, dominating gravitational forces approximately 5 billion years ago, resulting in the observed accelerating expansion of the universe.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of cosmological concepts such as the Big Bang theory
  • Familiarity with gravitational forces and their effects on cosmic expansion
  • Knowledge of dark energy and its role in the universe's acceleration
  • Awareness of observational astronomy techniques used to measure cosmic expansion
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties and implications of dark energy in modern cosmology
  • Study the observational evidence for the accelerating expansion of the universe
  • Explore the role of gravitational forces in cosmic dynamics
  • Investigate the history of cosmological theories leading up to the discovery of dark energy
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, physicists, and students of cosmology seeking to understand the complexities of dark energy and its impact on the universe's expansion.

Inderjeet Singh
Suppose the initial force and energy bursting out during big bang was very huge . The matter just after big bang would have been very close , so the gravitational attraction would have been very high , which would have caused the acceleration produced by big bang to decrease . As time increased , gravity between cosmological objects decreased ( due to increase of distance caused by initial acceleration of big bang ) . As gravity is the only major force between objects getting apart at a constant velocity , and it is decreasing , then an observer would notice that the objects are accelerating apart . That is what we know today ! . I just want to ask if dark energy is nothing but the initial force of big bang which seems to accelerate due to decrease of gravity ?

Ps – Sorry for my bad explanation skill :)
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Inderjeet Singh said:
I just want to ask if dark energy is nothing but the initial force of big bang which seems to accelerate due to decrease of gravity ?
No it is not. There would be NO acceleration due to the force of the BB (I mean, think about it) which is why, when the acceleration was first noticed (and attributed to the mysterious "dark energy") everyone was quite surprised.

Also, you might find it instructional to stop and think about whether you have come up with an idea that has eluded THOUSANDS of serious professional physicists.
 
Inderjeet Singh said:
Suppose the initial force and energy bursting out during big bang was very huge . The matter just after big bang would have been very close , so the gravitational attraction would have been very high , which would have caused the acceleration produced by big bang to decrease . As time increased , gravity between cosmological objects decreased ( due to increase of distance caused by initial acceleration of big bang ) . As gravity is the only major force between objects getting apart at a constant velocity , and it is decreasing , then an observer would notice that the objects are accelerating apart . That is what we know today ! . I just want to ask if dark energy is nothing but the initial force of big bang which seems to accelerate due to decrease of gravity ?

Ps – Sorry for my bad explanation skill :)
Welcome to the PF. :smile:

Please keep in mind that we do not discuss personal theories here on the PF. It is fine to phrase it in the form of a question, but proposing new mechanisms for observed phenomena is not allowed. Thanks.
 
Your hypothesis would not result in accelerating expansion,
It would result in an expansion rate that gradually decreases over time, and could possibly reverse in the future.
Prior to the 1990's this is what many astronomers expected they would observe when a new generation of more powerful telescopes went into service.
Instead the observations indicated that the acceleration rate actually is increasing over time.
That implies additional energy coming into existence after the initial big bang, and that's what got the name dark energy.
 
Last edited:
Inderjeet Singh said:
As gravity is the only major force between objects getting apart at a constant velocity , and it is decreasing , then an observer would notice that the objects are accelerating apart .
You mean expanding with a decreasing rate.
That would be the case if there was no dark energy. Then, the accelerating rate (or better said "expansion rate") would be decreasing.
rootone said:
Instead the observations indicated that the acceleration rate actually is increasing over time.
rootone said:
That implies additional energy coming into existence after the initial big bang, and that's what got the name dark energy.
Exactly!
Thus we just happen to live in that time era and age of the universe (i.e. ≅ 13.8 billion years after the big bang) where dark energy prevails over gravity and that's why we observe accelerating expansion of the universe. (That effect had already started roughly 5 billion years ago, or approximayelly 8.8 billion years after the big bang ...)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accelerating_expansion_of_the_universe

Note: current "precise" measurement of the age of the universe is (13.799 ± 0.021) billion (i.e. 109) years.
( https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_universe )
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
573
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K