Can two bodies exist in the same space-time position?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around whether two objects can occupy the same position in space-time, exploring the implications of this question in both classical and quantum contexts. Participants consider various scenarios, including macroscopic objects and pointlike particles, and the discussion touches on concepts from relativity and quantum mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that two bodies could overlap in space-time, suggesting that this might be represented as an intersection of their world lines, but they express uncertainty about the implications of having the exact same coordinates.
  • Others argue that the question may not be fundamentally about relativity, especially when considering macroscopic objects, and suggest that it might be more appropriate for discussions in quantum physics.
  • A participant notes that while identical bosons can occupy the same point in space-time, identical fermions cannot, highlighting the restrictions imposed by quantum mechanics on particle interactions.
  • Another viewpoint suggests that non-identical particles can coexist at the same point in space-time without restrictions on their wave functions.
  • One participant introduces a speculative idea about the wave-like nature of matter and the possibility of a baseball "vibrating" through a wall, although they acknowledge this is not practical in reality.
  • A later reply raises a question about the nature of photons, seeking clarification on whether they can be understood as packets of electromagnetic waves.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus, as there are multiple competing views regarding the nature of objects in space-time and the applicability of relativity versus quantum mechanics to the question.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the definitions of objects and particles, and the implications of their interactions in different theoretical frameworks remain unresolved.

freewanderer
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Can two objects overlap in space-time? Why or Why not? If so, what circumstances must exist? If not, by what mechanism are two objects deemed separate?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would think at a particular instance one could have two bodies in the same position in space time, but it would simply be an intersection of their world lines? However I would say that they cannot have the exact same coordinates, on the same coordinate system, for it seems then they would have to be inside one another. However, superimposing one of the coordinate systems on the other I would think that you could have the same coordinates, in space and in time. I have limited knowledge in this subject so don't quote it please :P
 
freewanderer said:
Can two objects overlap in space-time? Why or Why not? If so, what circumstances must exist? If not, by what mechanism are two objects deemed separate?

Are you talking about actual macroscopic objects, like two rocks? If so, then this isn't really a relativity question, and I think we ought to ask an administrator to move it to a forum like Quantum Physics, which is where you'll be more likely to get good answers.

If you're talking about pointlike particles, then actually I still don't see what's relativistic about the question. Relativity is a classical theory that can accommodate particles and fields, but the particles and fields are just sort of plugged into the theory. Relativity doesn't say anything about their properties. For instance, if you plug in a theory of pointlike particles with electric charge, then it's going to take infinite energy to get them right on top of each other -- but this is a fact about the theory you plugged into relativity, not about relativity itself.
 
This question is better suited for the Quantum Mechanics forum. In 3 dimensions in Quantum Mechanics, we get some restrictions on whether on not identical particles can be at the same point in space and time. (In 2 dimensions, it gets much more complicated)

Identical bosons can be at the same points in space and time (but the wave function of the collection must be unchanged on exchanging any 2 of the particles)
Identical fermions cannot be at the same point in space and time (and the wave function of the collection gains a negative sign on the exchanging of any 2 of the particles)
Non-identical particles (like an electron and a proton) can be at the same point in space and time with no restrictions on the wave function.
 
I've heard it said that a baseball could "vibrate" itself through a brick wall - so to speak - if it moved slow enough and its energy form (wave-like) would do its thing. It might take three billion years to accomplish this but was do-able.

Waves can pass through the same media at the same time and only affect each other at their common areas or zones of intersection, so if matter really was crystalized energy (waves) I suppose that would be possible.

It certainly has no place in the real world, though.
 
I have a question now... Is a photon a packet of electromagnetic waves along a "beam?' Like this:

-----------------/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\----------------------/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/----------/\/\/\/\/\/\/---->
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K