Can We Build a Shaw-Fujikawa Translight Engine for Space Travel?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the feasibility of constructing a Shaw-Fujikawa Translight Engine, as depicted in the HALO universe, for space travel. Participants assert that current technology is insufficient for such advanced propulsion systems, which rely on theoretical concepts like wormholes and micro black holes. The consensus is that significant hurdles remain, including the cost of fuel and radiation exposure during space travel. Ultimately, the discussion emphasizes that while science fiction inspires innovation, the actual engineering of such engines is not grounded in established scientific principles.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of theoretical physics concepts such as wormholes and micro black holes.
  • Familiarity with current space propulsion technologies, including ion engines and solar sails.
  • Knowledge of the challenges in space travel, including radiation exposure and fuel logistics.
  • Awareness of the distinction between science fiction and scientifically plausible engineering.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of ion propulsion and its applications in modern spacecraft.
  • Explore the theoretical underpinnings of wormholes and their implications for faster-than-light travel.
  • Investigate advancements in solar sail technology and their potential for future space missions.
  • Study the challenges of radiation shielding in space travel and current solutions being developed.
USEFUL FOR

Space enthusiasts, aerospace engineers, theoretical physicists, and anyone interested in the future of space travel and propulsion technologies.

  • #31
randeezy said:
I do realize that I am quoting Sci-Fi, but was it really that long ago when going to the Moon, or to Mars, or even to an ExoPlanet was Science Fiction?

Well, first, we haven't gone to an exoplanet. It is science fiction. In the strictest sense of "we", we haven't gone to Mars either.

Second, you're not really making the argument that because some things in science fiction eventually were invented means that anything in science fiction is going to happen. Why is there no Cavorite today? Wells wrote about it a century ago. Or giant geese to pull spaceships to the 'moone'? Godwin wrote about them four centuries ago.

randeezy said:
One more thing: We always talk about traveling through space on a linear plane.

"Linear plane"? That's like "square circle".

russ_watters said:
No amount of technology can turn gibberish into an object.

Best. Post. Ever.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #32
Vanadium 50 said:
Second, you're not really making the argument that because some things in science fiction eventually were invented means that anything in science fiction is going to happen. ... giant geese to pull spaceships to the 'moone'? Godwin wrote about them four centuries ago.
Oh snap! That's exactly what I was thinking of posting!
 
  • #33
Exactly! Where are the giant geese?

And, while we're at it - where are the lush jungles of Venus? And the scantily clad maidens of Mars?
 
  • #34
In the near future the "flight crew" will be computers & machinery, rather than biological beings. Practical conclusions I am getting out of this thread:

1. solve the problem of getting fuel into orbit, for discretionary acceleration/deceleration.

2. work on minimizing exposure to spacecraft and the "crew."

3. leave the rest to solar sails.

[Maybe work on a business plan, while at it.]
 
Last edited:
  • #35
How is leave the rest to solar sails practical? We can't use them to get to towards the sun where they are most efficient and they are not particularly good past the asteroid belt. So it would seem a pointless technology, especially given the size of them.
 
  • #36
Ok, so we know now not to delve into Sci-Fi (I learned my lesson) and Solar Sails are impractical at distances greater than 3.27 AU. But what about the VASIMIR Plasma Engine?
 
  • #37
Sounds ok, but you would need a source of power to do the ionizing and also a source of propellant, bringing you back to the 'fuel into space' scenario where you aren't able to carry enough supplies due to the exponential increase in requirement.
The power source, what would it be? On Earth this isn't an issue but in space...

The propellant side of things could be dealt with initially by launching it separately into orbit and going from there, but you still have to power it in deep space/on the journey to Mars etc. and particularly with deep space how would you source the propellant?
 
  • #38
The fuel source is Hydrogen and it uses cryomagnets (I think that's what they're called.) The are light weight, and they only work in the low temps in space. They're used to propel the plasma out the back. The mags will be in a ring to keep the plasma in the center so it doesn't touch the mags. It uses radio waves to ionize the gas. And in space, the fuel is endless...

And sorry, it's VASIMR

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VASIMR
 
  • #39
Your article doesn't mention cryomagnets, I would be interested to see where you read about them in the design. CERN uses them, but they are superconductors which implies electric, which again requires a power source.

Fuel is endless? Ever read the official definition of a vacuum? If you are traveling between stars where would you get the hydrogen? And what would power the craft?

(I always thought a true vacuum was <1 hydrogen atom per metre cubed? So not exactly abundant. I wouldn't mind someone to confirm/disprove that for me.)
 
  • #40
jarednjames said:
How is leave the rest to solar sails practical? We can't use them to get to towards the sun where they are most efficient and they are not particularly good past the asteroid belt. So it would seem a pointless technology, especially given the size of them.
Loose every sail to the breeze and don't stop until you get there.
 
  • #41
Since we are completely in the realm of science fiction, how about a ship which moves the universe around it. Or more precisely the space which the ship fills moves through the universe while the ship remains stationary in its own bubble of space. Perfect sci-fi solution. Vaguely possible with our current understanding of the universe, and it has no inertial related problems or relativistic problems.

Wait, they did that on Futurama.
 
  • #42
chayced said:
Since we are completely in the realm of science fiction, how about a ship which moves the universe around it. Or more precisely the space which the ship fills moves through the universe while the ship remains stationary in its own bubble of space. Perfect sci-fi solution. Vaguely possible with our current understanding of the universe, and it has no inertial related problems or relativistic problems.

Wait, they did that on Futurama.
And in Dune. Get the ship above the atmosphere and the Navigator "folds space".
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
13K