Insights Can We Tell Whether the Universe Is Rotating? - Comments

  • Thread starter Thread starter Multiple_Authors
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rotating Universe
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the question of whether the universe is rotating, referencing the Cosmic Background Radiation experiment (COBE 2006), which indicated a zero overall rotation within the instrument's accuracy limits. It highlights Kurt Gödel's 1949 proof of closed time-like curves within Einstein's General Relativity, suggesting that a rotating universe could permit time travel. However, the current data suggests that significant rotation does not exist, challenging the implications of Gödel's solutions, known as the Gödel metric.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of General Relativity and Einstein's field equations
  • Familiarity with the Cosmic Background Radiation (COBE 2006) data
  • Knowledge of Gödel's metric and its implications for time travel
  • Basic concepts of four-dimensional spacetime and its properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of Gödel's metric on modern physics
  • Explore the methodologies used in the COBE 2006 experiment
  • Study the relationship between rotation in spacetime and cosmic expansion
  • Investigate current theories on time travel and their scientific basis
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, physicists, and students of theoretical physics interested in the nature of the universe, spacetime, and the implications of rotation on cosmic phenomena.

Multiple_Authors
Messages
9
Reaction score
6
Multiple_Authors submitted a new PF Insights post

Can We Tell Whether the Universe Is Rotating?

universespinning-80x80.png


Continue reading the Original PF Insights Post.
 
Space news on Phys.org
Does rotation of four dimensional space result in hyperbolic expansion of three dimensional sub-space with increasing time?
 
bahamagreen said:
Does rotation of four dimensional space result in hyperbolic expansion of three dimensional sub-space with increasing time?

There can't be any invariant answer to this, because there is no preferred way to split up spacetime into "space" and "time", so there is no invariant definition of "three-dimensional sub-space".
 
The Cosmic Background Radiation experiment (COBE 2006) data indicated that overall rotation of the universe was zero, which was within the limits of accuracy of the instrument.

In 1949, Kurt Gödel proved the existence of solutions involving closed time-like curves, to Albert Einstein's field equations within the Theory of General Relativity. His solution required a rotating universe, which would allow time travel to the past and caused Einstein to have doubts about his own theory. His solutions are known as the Gödel metric. Hollywood time travel stories are very popular 'Star Trek IV' etc. However, time traveller's from the future are either very discrete or choose to come to our period (I don't blame them!). Or the universe does not rotate significantly, as indicated by COBE.
 
I always thought it was odd that we know dark energy expands our universe, and that we know it has been increasing over time, yet no one ever expressed a "true" size of the universe (not "observable" universe, the ENTIRE universe) by just reversing the process of expansion based on our understanding of its rate through history, to the point where everything would've been in an extremely small region. The more I've looked into it recently, I've come to find that it is due to that "inflation"...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
9K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
19K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K