Discussion Overview
The thread revolves around the upcoming GURU Awards, focusing on humor and nominations for the "Funniest Member Award." Participants express their desire for increased humor and fun in the forum leading up to the event, while also discussing the nature of humor itself.
Discussion Character
- Exploratory
- Debate/contested
- Meta-discussion
Main Points Raised
- Some participants express frustration over the lack of humor in the forum, urging others to be funnier.
- There are playful exchanges about sending chocolates as bribes for nominations, with some participants jokingly refusing to do so.
- Several participants suggest nominees for the awards, including references to past humor and contributions.
- Discussions arise about whether humor is an innate quality or influenced by environmental factors, with differing opinions on the matter.
- Some participants emphasize the importance of keeping the contest clean and free from unethical tactics.
- There are humorous claims about the competition, with various participants asserting their own candidacy and joking about their chances.
- References to cultural differences in humor, with some suggesting that British humor has an advantage.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants generally agree that humor is a key aspect of the upcoming awards, but there are multiple competing views on the nature of humor and the appropriateness of tactics used in nominations. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to humor and competition.
Contextual Notes
Some statements about humor's origins and influences are based on personal beliefs and experiences, and there is no consensus on whether humor can be taught or is inherent.