Can You Identify the Scientist Behind This Formula?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter micromass
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The thread revolves around a game where participants post scientific formulas and others guess the associated scientists. The discussion includes various formulas from physics and mathematics, exploring their namesakes and the context behind them.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant introduces the uncertainty principle formula \(\sigma(x)\sigma(p)\geq \frac{\hbar}{2}\) and identifies it with Heisenberg.
  • Another participant presents a formula related to transition probabilities, suggesting it may be Fermi's Golden Rule.
  • A different formula is proposed, \(\frac {n^2 - 1}{n^2 + 2} = \frac{4 \pi}{3} N \alpha\), with a hint about its name being associated with two similar names.
  • Participants discuss the Clausius-Mossotti relation and the Lorentz-Lorenz equation, with some uncertainty about the correct naming.
  • The Wigner-Eckart theorem is recognized by a participant, who expresses a lack of motivation to present their own formula.
  • Fatou's lemma is mentioned in a mathematical context, alongside a reference to a lesser-known formula associated with Paul Bamberg.
  • Another participant suggests the Hirzebruch–Riemann–Roch theorem, correcting their earlier guess.
  • Formulas related to black hole thermodynamics and Bondi energy are introduced, with a participant questioning the connection to Noetherian currents.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various guesses and interpretations of the formulas, leading to multiple competing views without a clear consensus on some of the names and associations.

Contextual Notes

Some formulas are presented with hints or contextual clues, but there are unresolved uncertainties regarding the correct names and associations of certain formulas.

micromass
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Messages
22,170
Reaction score
3,333
Do you know this formula??

Let's try to make a little game out of scientific formulas. The idea is that I post a scientific formula which is named after a famous scientist. The goal is to guess the scientist(s) associated with the formula.

The person who answers correctly, gets to present a new formula. Etc.

So let's start easy:

[tex]\sigma(x)\sigma(p)\geq \frac{\hbar}{2}[/tex]
 
Physics news on Phys.org


micromass said:
Let's try to make a little game out of scientific formulas. The idea is that I post a scientific formula which is named after a famous scientist. The goal is to guess the scientist(s) associated with the formula.

The person who answers correctly, gets to present a new formula. Etc.

So let's start easy:

[tex]\sigma(x)\sigma(p)\geq \frac{\hbar}{2}[/tex]

Heisenberg!
 


kevinferreira said:
Heisenberg!

Of course! :approve:

You can put up a new formula if you want!
 


Ok, here it goes a nice (but long) one, with a nice name too:

[tex] \frac{d}{dt}P_{m\rightarrow n}(t)=2\pi |\langle n|H_{int}|m\rangle |^2 \rho(E)[/tex]
 


Would that be Fermi's Golden Rule?

Here's one that's perhaps not so famous, but has a name that makes me smile when I see it:

$$\frac {n^2 - 1}{n^2 + 2} = \frac{4 \pi}{3} N \alpha$$

Hint: it's named after two people whose names are very very similar.
 


micromass said:
So let's start easy

I was uncertain, but I thought you might be looking for a deviation from standard nomenclature.
 


jtbell said:
Would that be Fermi's Golden Rule?

Here's one that's perhaps not so famous, but has a name that makes me smile when I see it:

$$\frac {n^2 - 1}{n^2 + 2} = \frac{4 \pi}{3} N \alpha$$

Hint: it's named after two people whose names are very very similar.


Clausius-Mossotti?

How about this:
$$ \left\langle \alpha' j'm'|T^{(k)}_{q}|\alpha j m \right\rangle = \frac{\left\langle \alpha' j'||T^{(k)}||\alpha j \right\rangle}{\sqrt{2j'+1}}\left\langle kjqm|kjj'm'\right\rangle $$
 


Dr Transport said:
Clausius-Mossotti?

That's one name for it, but not the name I was thinking of.
 


jtbell said:
That's one name for it, but not the name I was thinking of.

Lorentz-Lorenz equation?

No idea about Dr Transport his formula though...
 
  • #10


micromass said:
Lorentz-Lorenz equation?

No idea about Dr Transport his formula though...

hint: one of the people this formula is named for wrote a very well known group theory book
 
  • #11


Dr Transport said:
$$ \left\langle \alpha' j'm'|T^{(k)}_{q}|\alpha j m \right\rangle = \frac{\left\langle \alpha' j'||T^{(k)}||\alpha j \right\rangle}{\sqrt{2j'+1}}\left\langle kjqm|kjj'm'\right\rangle $$

Wigner-Eckart Theorem.

I recognized this as soon as I saw it, but I have been too lazy to think of my own puzzle.
 
  • #12


Okay,

[tex]\int \liminf_{n\rightarrow +\infty} |f_n| d\mu\leq \liminf_{n\rightarrow +\infty} \int |f_n|d\mu[/tex]

Thanks, micromass.
 
  • #13
Fatou's lemma.chi(L) = [e^(ch(L)).Todd(X)](dim(X)). (3 names)Here's a rather obscure one physics students of Paul Bamberg at Harvard in the 1960's all knew:

617-495-9560 (Bamberg's number)
 
Last edited:
  • #14
Wannabe: I just noticed you have to answer the previous one to get to post a question.
 
  • #15
mathwonk said:
Wannabe: I just noticed you have to answer the previous one to get to post a question.
Oh, well in that case I have no idea what your formula is lol...Newton's 2nd law is out of the question innit :)? (I deleted my post by the way)

EDIT: is it the Hirzebruch–Riemann–Roch theorem?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
  • #16
yes! (I got it wrong myself, thinking it was Grothendieck Riemann Roch.)
 
  • #17
Yay! Ok mine will still be ##\xi_{[a}\nabla_{b]}\kappa = 0##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
  • #18
WannabeNewton said:
Yay! Ok mine will still be ##\xi_{[a}\nabla_{b]}\kappa = 0##

zeroth law of black hole thermodynamics

##E = -\lim_{S_{\alpha}\rightarrow \mathcal{P}}\frac{1}{8\pi}\int _{S_{\alpha}}\epsilon_{abcd}\nabla^{c}\xi^{d}##
 
  • #19
PhizKid said:
##E = -\lim_{S_{\alpha}\rightarrow \mathcal{P}}\frac{1}{8\pi}\int _{S_{\alpha}}\epsilon_{abcd}\nabla^{c}\xi^{d}##

Why, that's the good ol' Bondi energy, of course!

Here's mine: ##y=mx+b##
 
  • #20
AnTiFreeze3 said:
Here's mine: ##y=mx+b##
Is this the Noetherian current obtained from Lorentz transformations? Seems like it.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
  • #21
WannabeNewton said:
Is this the Noetherian current obtained from Lorentz transformations? Seems like it.

You're getting close!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
8K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
9K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K