Can You Outrace the Sun? Debating the Possibility and Necessary Speed in MPH

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Matloc890
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sun The sun
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility of a person outrace the sun while flying in a plane. Participants explore the necessary speed in miles per hour (MPH) to maintain daylight by either matching the Earth's rotational velocity or calculating the sun's apparent motion based on the Earth's diameter. The scope includes theoretical considerations and personal experiences related to flight and sunset observation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that to outrun the sun, one must exceed the Earth's rotational velocity, while another proposes calculating the necessary speed based on the sun's travel across the Earth's diameter, estimating it at ~330 MPH.
  • Another participant calculates that to keep the sun in the same position in the sky while flying west, a speed of 1035 MPH is required, adjusted by the cosine of the latitude, resulting in around 500 MPH at 60 degrees latitude.
  • A participant mentions that at the poles, the necessary speed to maintain daylight could theoretically be 0 MPH, as one could stand still and rotate with the Earth.
  • One participant shares a personal experience of flying from Paris to San Francisco, noting that they followed the sunset and could have matched the speed of the terminator with a slightly faster flight.
  • Another participant elaborates on the concept of outracing the Earth rather than the sun, explaining the relationship between angular velocity and latitude, and providing a formula for the necessary speed based on latitude.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the necessary speed to outrun the sun, with some calculations suggesting varying speeds based on latitude. There is no consensus on a single speed or method, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to the question.

Contextual Notes

Some calculations depend on assumptions about the Earth's shape and rotation, and the discussion includes various interpretations of how to measure the necessary speed to maintain daylight.

Matloc890
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Me and a friend have been wondering if it would be possible for a person to outrace the sun. more accurately, in a plane.
One of us is argueing that we would need to outrace the Earth's rotational velocity, the other is argueing that we could calculate the velocity of the sun by assuming that the sun travels the diameter of the Earth in 24 hours, thereby resulting in a necicary speed of ~330 MPH.
i was just wondering if someone could shine some light on this? how fast do we need to go (In MPH) to outrun the sun, and stay in daylight for as long as the fuel would last us
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
0 mph.
 
In order to keep the sun in the same position in the sky by flying due west you need a speed of 1035 mph times cosine(latitude). That means it takes the full 1035 mph at equator and only half, around 500 mph, at 60 deg north or south (cos(60) = 0.5). Since 500 mph is around the top speed at altitude for most civilian airliners, such jet would be able to keep up if it flew at around latitude 60 deg or more north.
 
Matloc890 said:
...assuming that the sun travels the diameter of the Earth in 24 hours, thereby resulting in a necicary speed of ~330 MPH.
That should be in terms of circumference.

So, if the circumference is 0, such as at the poles...
KalamMekhar said:
0 mph.
You could just stand at the pole and rotate.
 
I flew from Paris to San Francisco years ago in late May. We took off 10 minutes before sunset, and landed 10 minutes after sunset. We followed the sunset around the world. I had a window seat and watched this 10-hour sunset. Had we traveled slightly faster, shaving 20 minutes off the flight time, we would have matched the speed of the terminator.
 
tony873004 said:
I flew from Paris to San Francisco years ago in late May. We took off 10 minutes before sunset, and landed 10 minutes after sunset. We followed the sunset around the world. I had a window seat and watched this 10-hour sunset. Had we traveled slightly faster, shaving 20 minutes off the flight time, we would have matched the speed of the terminator.

That sounds pretty great. Next time I'm on a plane going west, i'll have to watch the sun. I have never gone west in a plane, I have flown south and north many times.
 
Actually, you won't outrace the Sun, but outrace the Earth. If you keep traveling due West with a sufficiently high speed, then your angular velocity around the Earth's axis would become equal by magnitude, but opposite in direction from the angular velocity of Earth's rotation around its axis. Then, relative to the Sun, you will not have any angular speed and the Sun will be in the same position on the sky.

But, your trajectory is a circle with a different radius, depending on the latitude where you travel. You may convince yourself, that if the Earth's radius is R, then the radius of a circle perpendicular to the Earth's axis at a latitude \lambda is:

<br /> r = R \, \cos \lambda<br />

The necessary speed is then:

<br /> v = \frac{2 \, \pi \, r}{T} = \frac{2 \, \pi \, R}{T} \, \cos \lambda = v_{e} \, \cos \lambda<br />

where

<br /> v_{e} = \frac{2 \, \pi \, R}{T} = \frac{4 \times 10^{7} \, \mathrm{m}}{8.64 \times 10^{4} \, \mathrm{s}} = 463 \, \frac{\mathrm{m}}{\mathrm{s}}<br />

is the necessary speed on the Equator. Notice that this is higher than the speed of the sound and corresponds to a Mach number of about M = 1.3.

However, because the cosine is a monotonically decreasing function with angle, at higher latitudes (both North and South of the Equator), the necessary speed decreases.

Question: What is the necessary speed at the Poles and when can you observe this effect?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K