Can you Prove that {2}_{}an+1 = _{}an _{}an+2 =(-1)n for the Fibonacci series?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around proving a mathematical statement related to the Fibonacci series, specifically the equation involving squares of Fibonacci numbers and a term dependent on the parity of n. The scope includes mathematical reasoning and proof techniques, particularly induction.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning, Homework-related, Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant requests help with proving the equation \( a_{n+1}^2 = a_n a_{n+2} + (-1)^n \) for the Fibonacci series.
  • Another participant suggests that the original equation may have a typographical error, proposing a correction to the equation format.
  • A participant emphasizes the importance of using proper formatting for mathematical expressions in the forum, recommending the use of specific tags for clarity.
  • Further, a participant outlines a proof by induction approach, breaking it into cases based on the parity of k, but does not provide a definitive conclusion about the proof's validity.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no consensus on the correctness of the original equation or the proposed proof method. Multiple interpretations and corrections are suggested, indicating ongoing uncertainty and debate.

Contextual Notes

Participants express concerns about the clarity of mathematical notation and the potential for errors in the original statement. The discussion includes assumptions about the Fibonacci sequence and the validity of the proposed proof structure.

Suk-Sci
Messages
44
Reaction score
0
Mathematical induction...please help me!

[tex]_{}a[/tex]1 =1, [tex]_{}a[/tex]2 =1,[tex]_{}a[/tex]3 =2,[tex]_{}a[/tex]4 =3...[tex]_{}a[/tex]n = [tex]_{}a[/tex]n-1 + [tex]_{}a[/tex]n-2 is a Fibonacci series...Prove That
[tex]^{2}_{}a[/tex]n+1 = [tex]_{}a[/tex]n [tex]_{}a[/tex]n+2 =(-1)n
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


that is a ^2_n+1
 


Sorry, but your mix of LaTeX and forum formatting is completely unreadable. Check out this thread: https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=386951 and try to repost the equation.
 
Last edited by a moderator:


Suk-Sci said:
[tex]_{}a[/tex]1 =1, [tex]_{}a[/tex]2 =1,[tex]_{}a[/tex]3 =2,[tex]_{}a[/tex]4 =3...[tex]_{}a[/tex]n = [tex]_{}a[/tex]n-1 + [tex]_{}a[/tex]n-2 is a Fibonacci series...Prove That
[tex]^{2}_{}a[/tex]n+1 = [tex]_{}a[/tex]n [tex]_{}a[/tex]n+2 =(-1)n
It is far better to put "[ tex ]" or "[ itex ] [/itex ]" tagas around entire equations rather than bits and pieces!

[itex]a_1= 1[/itex], [itex]a_2= 1[/itex], [itex]a_{n+2}= a_{n+1}+ a_n[/itex]
is a Fibonacci series.

I believe you also have an "=" where should have a "+". I think you want to prove that
[tex]a_{n+1}^2= a_n a_{n+2}+ (-1)^n[/itex]?<br /> In the case that n=1, for example, [itex]a_1= 1[/itex], [itex]a_2= 1[/itex], and [itex]a_3= 2[/itex] so your formula becomes [itex]1^2= 1(2)+ (-1)[/itex] which is true. If n= 2, [itex]a_2= 1[/itex], [itex]a_3= 2[/itex], and [itex]a_ 3[/itex] so your formula becomes [itex]2^2= (1)(3)+ 1[/itex] which is true.<br /> <br /> I would recommend proof by induction on n.<br /> <br /> Suppose [itex]a_{k+1}^2= a_k a_{k+2}+ (-1)^k[/itex]. You now want to prove that [itex]a_{k+2}^2= a_{k+1}a_{k+3}+ (-1)^{k+1}[/itex]. <br /> <br /> I would now break the proof into two cases:<br /> 1) k is odd. You have that [itex]a_{k+1}^2= a_k a_{k+2}- 1[/itex] and want to prove that [itex]a_{k+2}^2= a_{k+1}a_{k+3}+ 1[/itex] where [itex]a_{k+3}= a_{k+1}+ a_{k+2}[/itex] so that [itex]a_{k+2}= a_{k+3}- a_{k+1}[/itex].<br /> <br /> 2) k is even. You have that [itex]a_{k+1}^2= a_k a_{k+2}+ 1[/itex] and want to prove that [itex]a_{k+2}^2= a_{k+1}a_{k+3}- 1[/itex] where [itex]a_{k+3}= a_{k+1}+ a_{k+2}[/itex] so that [itex]a_{k+2}= a_{k+3}- a_{k+1}[/itex].[/tex]
 
Last edited by a moderator:


Thankx...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K