MHB Can You Prove That $\tan 50^{\circ}>1.18$ Without a Calculator?

anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Without the help of calculator, show that $\tan 50^{\circ}>1.18$
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
anemone said:
Without the help of calculator, show that $\tan 50^{\circ}>1.18$

[sp]Considering the first eight of the McLaurin series of the function tan x...

$\displaystyle \tan x \sim x + \frac{1}{3}\ x^{3} + \frac{2}{15}\ x^{5} + \frac {17}{315}\ x^{7}\ (1)$... setting in (1) $x = \frac{5}{18}\ \pi$ You obtain... $\displaystyle \tan x \sim 1.182468$[/sp]

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
chisigma said:
[sp]Considering the first eight of the McLaurin series of the function tan x...

$\displaystyle \tan x \sim x + \frac{1}{3}\ x^{3} + \frac{2}{15}\ x^{5} + \frac {17}{315}\ x^{7}\ (1)$... setting in (1) $x = \frac{5}{18}\ \pi$ You obtain... $\displaystyle \tan x \sim 1.182468$[/sp]

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$

Thanks for participating, chisigma and I think your solution is a good one! :o

I still welcome others to give a stab at it, as I can tell there is other way(perhaps many other ways) to prove the inequality to be true.
 
I will omit the degree sign ($^\circ$) in the proof. Note
\[
\tan 150 = \tan (180 - 30) = \frac{\tan 180 - \tan 30}{1 + \tan 180 \tan 30} = -\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}.
\]
We will use the formula:
\[
\tan 3a = \frac{3 \tan a - \tan^3 a}{1 - 3 \tan^2 a}.
\]
So we have:
\[
-\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}} = \tan 150 = \tan (50 \cdot 3) = \frac{3 \tan 50 - \tan^3 50}{1 - 3 \tan^2 50}
\]
Let $x = \tan 50$, that equation becomes:
\[
-\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}} = \frac{3 x- x^3}{1 - 3x^2} \Longrightarrow 3x^3 + 3\sqrt{3} x^2 - 9x - \sqrt{3} = 0.
\]

Define $f(x) := 3x^3 + 3\sqrt{3} x^2 - 9x - \sqrt{3}$, note that $\sqrt{3} > 1.7$.
$f(\sqrt{3}) = 9\sqrt{3} + 9\sqrt{3} - 9\sqrt{3} - \sqrt{3} > 9(1.7) - \sqrt{3} > 0$.

We can rewrite $f$ as $x(3x(x+\sqrt{3})-9)-\sqrt{3}$, so
$f(1.18) = 1.18(1.18\cdot 3(1.18+\sqrt{3})-9)-\sqrt{3} < 0$. By IVT, there is some $x \in (1.18,\sqrt{3})$
where $f(x) = 0$. So, $\tan 50 > 1.18$. Note that over the range $[0,\frac{\pi}{2})$, $\tan(\cdot)$ is monotonically
increasing, so if there is a root in that interval, it is unique.
 
\[tan(50) = tan(\frac{\pi}{4}+\frac{\pi}{36})=\frac{1+tan(
\frac{\pi}{36})}{1-tan(\frac{\pi}{36})} \\\\ tan(x)\approx x + \frac{1}{3}x^3 +...\;\; (MacLaurin \;series) \; gives: tan(x) > x \;\;for\;\; small\;\;positive \;\;x \\\\ Thus, I get: \\\\ tan(50) > \frac{1+\frac{\pi}{36}}{1-\frac{\pi}{36}}=\frac{36+\pi}{36-\pi}> \frac{36+3}{36-3}=39/33=13/11\approx 1.18\]
 
Hi magneto and lfdahl,

Thanks for the solution and participation to my challenge problem!:)

A solution I saw that is provided by other:

$\tan 50^{\circ}=\tan (45^{\circ}+5^{\circ})=\dfrac{\tan45^{\circ}+\tan5^{\circ}}{1-\tan45^{\circ}\tan5^{\circ}}=\dfrac{1+\tan5^{\circ}}{1-\tan5^{\circ}}$

But note that $\tan 5^{\circ}=\tan \left( \dfrac{\pi}{36} \right) >\dfrac{\pi}{36}>\dfrac{3}{36}=\dfrac{1}{12}$ which gives

$1+\tan 5^{\circ}>\dfrac{13}{12}$ and $\dfrac{1}{1-\tan 5^{\circ}}>\dfrac{12}{11}$

This implies $\dfrac{1+\tan5^{\circ}}{1-\tan5^{\circ}}>\dfrac{13}{11}$ so $\tan 50^{\circ}>\dfrac{13}{11}>1.18$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top