MHB Can you prove the inequality for positive integers?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ackbach
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    2016
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the inequality involving the product of odd integers for positive integers n. The inequality states that (2n-1/e)^(2n-1)/2 is less than the product of the first n odd integers, which is less than (2n+1/e)^(2n+1)/2. This problem was featured as Problem B-2 in the 1996 William Lowell Putnam Mathematical Competition. Opalg provided a correct solution and has been actively participating in the Problem of the Week. The thread encourages readers to refer to guidelines for submitting solutions.
Ackbach
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,148
Reaction score
94
My apologies for being late this week. Here is this week's POTW:

-----

Show that for every positive integer $n$,
\[
\left( \frac{2n-1}{e} \right)^{\frac{2n-1}{2}} < 1 \cdot 3 \cdot 5
\cdots (2n-1) < \left( \frac{2n+1}{e} \right)^{\frac{2n+1}{2}}.
\]

-----

Remember to read the http://www.mathhelpboards.com/showthread.php?772-Problem-of-the-Week-%28POTW%29-Procedure-and-Guidelines to find out how to http://www.mathhelpboards.com/forms.php?do=form&fid=2!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Re: Problem Of The Week # 225 - Jul 21, 2016

This was Problem B-2 in the 1996 William Lowell Putnam Mathematical Competition.

Congratulations to Opalg for his correct (of course) solution. He appeared to be on a roll this week, answering every single level of POTW! Here is his solution:

Let $f(x) = x(\ln x - 1)$. Notice that $f(x)$ is the indefinite integral of $\ln x$. Notice also that $f(1) = -1 < 0$; and $f(3) = 3(\ln3-1) > 0$ (because $3>e$ and so $\ln3 > 1$).

Therefore $$\int_1^{2n-1}\ln x\,dx = f(2n-1) - f(1) > f(2n-1) = (2n-1)\bigl(\ln(2n-1) - 1\bigr).$$ Now form the upper Riemann sum for this integral, using subintervals of length $2$ on the interval $[1,2n-1].$ Since $\ln x$ is an increasing function, its supremum on each subinterval will be its value at the right-hand endpoint of the subinterval. The upper Riemann sum is therefore $2\bigl(\ln3 + \ln5 +\ldots + \ln(2n-1)\bigr).$ The upper Riemann sum is larger than the integral, so that $$(2n-1)\bigl(\ln(2n-1) - 1\bigr) < \int_1^{2n-1}\ln x\,dx < 2\bigl(\ln3 + \ln5 +\ldots + \ln(2n-1)\bigr).$$ Adding $\ln 1\;(=0)$ makes no difference to the sum, so $\dfrac{2n-1}2\bigl(\ln(2n-1) - 1\bigr) < \ln1 + \ln3 + \ln5 +\ldots + \ln(2n-1).$ Now take the exponential of both sides to get $$\Bigl(\dfrac{2n-1}e\Bigr)^{(2n-1)/2} < 1\cdot 3 \cdot 5 \cdots (2n-1).$$

The proof for the other inequality is essentially the same. This time, use the interval $[3,2n+1].$ Again, divide it into subintervals of length 2, and form the lower Riemann sum for $$\int_3^{2n+1}\ln x\,dx = f(2n+1) - f(3) < f(2n+1) = (2n+1)\bigl(\ln(2n+1) - 1\bigr)$$ (because $f(3) > 0$). The lower Riemann sum this time is $2\bigl(\ln1 + \ln3 + \ln5 +\ldots + \ln(2n-1)\bigr).$ It is less than the integral, and so $$2\bigl(\ln1 + \ln3 + \ln5 +\ldots + \ln(2n-1)\bigr) < \int_3^{2n+1}\ln x\,dx < (2n+1)\bigl(\ln(2n+1) - 1\bigr).$$ Therefore $\ln1 +\ln3 + \ln5 +\ldots + \ln(2n-1) < \dfrac{2n+1}2\bigl(\ln(2n+1) - 1\bigr).$ As previously, exponentiate, to get $$1\cdot 3 \cdot 5 \cdots (2n-1) < \Bigl(\dfrac{2n+1}e\Bigr)^{(2n+1)/2}.$$
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K