MHB Can You Prove This Inequality Challenge?

AI Thread Summary
The inequality challenge focuses on proving that the series sum \( \sum_{r=0}^{2n}(-1)^rx^{r^2} = 1-x + x^4 - x^9 + x^{16} - \ldots + x^{(2n)^2} \) is greater than \( \frac{1}{2} \) for all \( x \) in the interval \( 0 < x < 1 \). Graphical analysis suggests that the function remains above \( \frac{1}{2} \) within this range. The discussion emphasizes the need for a formal proof of this assertion. Adding more terms to the series appears to reinforce the claim. The challenge invites mathematicians to explore and validate this inequality.
Opalg
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
2,778
Reaction score
13
In a recent https://mathhelpboards.com/threads/inequality-challenge.27634/#post-121156, anemone asked for a proof that $1-x + x^4 - x^9 + x^{16} - x^{25} + x^{36} > 0$. When I graphed that function, I noticed that in fact it is never less than $\frac12$. If you add more terms to the series, this becomes even more apparent:

https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/311520._xfImport

So the challenge is to prove that$$ \sum_{r=0}^{2n}(-1)^rx^{r^2} = 1-x + x^4 - x^9 + x^{16} -\ldots + x^{(2n)^2} > \frac12$$ for all $x$ such that $0<x<1$ (outside that interval the result is obvious anyway).
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
For $0<x<1$ the infinite series $$\sum_{r=0}^\infty (-1)^rx^{r^2}$$ is convergent. It is an alternating series, where the terms alternate in sign and decrease in absolute value. It has the property that the partial sums are alternately greater than, and less than, the sum of the whole series.

Let $$S = \sum_{r=0}^\infty (-1)^rx^{r^2}$$, and for $n\geqslant 1$ let $$S_n = \sum_{r=0}^n (-1)^rx^{r^2}$$. Then $S_{2n-1}<S<S_{2n}$. So to prove that $S_{2n} > \frac12$ it will be sufficient to show that $S\geqslant\frac12$.

To investigate $S$, use the Jacobi triple product, which says that $$\sum_{n=-\infty}^\infty x^{n^2}y^{2n} = \prod_{m=1}^\infty (1-x^{2m})(1+x^{2m-1}y^2)\left(1+\frac{x^{2m-1}}{y^2}\right)$$ for complex numbers $x,y$ with $|x|<1$ and $y\ne0$. For $0<x<1$ and $y=i$ that gives $$\sum_{n=-\infty}^\infty(-1)^n x^{n^2} = \prod_{m=1}^\infty (1-x^{2m})\bigl(1-(-1)^nx^{2m-1}\bigr)^2.$$ Each factor in that product is positive, so the infinite product must be positive or zero. Therefore $$\sum_{n=-\infty}^\infty(-1)^n x^{n^2} \geqslant 0.$$ But $$\sum_{n=-\infty}^\infty(-1)^n x^{n^2} = \sum_{n=-\infty}^0(-1)^n x^{n^2} + \sum_{n=0}^\infty(-1)^n x^{n^2} - 1$$ (the $-1$ coming from the fact that otherwise the $n=0$ term would be counted twice). Also, $(-1)^n x^{n^2}$ is the same for $-n$ as it is for $+n$. Therefore $2S-1\geqslant0$, so that $S\geqslant\frac12$, as required.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top