MHB Can you spot the error in my substitution method for solving this DE?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MacLaddy1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Substitution
MacLaddy1
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
Hello all, it's been a long time. Hoping I can get some assistance with what is probably a simple substitution problem, yet it's flummoxing me.

$$\frac{dy}{dx} = \frac{y+t}{t}$$

I've tried substituting $$ v = y+t $$
$$ y = v - t $$
$$ \frac{dy}{dx} = \frac{dv}{dt} - 1 $$
$$\frac{dv}{dt}-1 = \frac{v}{t}$$
That would be simple enough, but the -1 is throwing me off.
$$\frac{dv}{v}-\frac{1}{v} = \frac{dt}{t}$$
Definitely something wrong there...

Please show me the error in my ways?

Thanks much,
Mac
 
Physics news on Phys.org
MacLaddy said:
Hello all, it's been a long time. Hoping I can get some assistance with what is probably a simple substitution problem, yet it's flummoxing me.

$$\frac{dy}{dx} = \frac{y+t}{t}$$

I've tried substituting $$ v = y+t $$
$$ y = v - t $$
$$ \frac{dy}{dx} = \frac{dv}{dt} - 1 $$
$$\frac{dv}{dt}-1 = \frac{v}{t}$$
That would be simple enough, but the -1 is throwing me off.
$$\frac{dv}{v}-\frac{1}{v} = \frac{dt}{t}$$
Definitely something wrong there...

Please show me the error in my ways?

Thanks much,
Mac

For starters, the problem doesn't make sense if you have a $\dfrac{dy}{dx}$ there. Seeing your work makes me think that the original equation should be
\[\frac{dy}{dt}=\frac{y+t}{t}=\frac{y}{t}+1.\]
Here, you can make the substitution $y=ut\implies \dfrac{dy}{dt}=u+t\dfrac{du}{dt}$. Thus, you get that
\[u+t\frac{du}{dt}=\frac{ut}{t}+1\implies u+t\frac{du}{dt}=u+1\implies \frac{du}{dt}=\frac{1}{t}.\]
That last differential equation is simple enough to solve.

Can you take things from here?
 
Chris L T521 said:
For starters, the problem doesn't make sense if you have a $\dfrac{dy}{dx}$ there. Seeing your work makes me think that the original equation should be
\[\frac{dy}{dt}=\frac{y+t}{t}=\frac{y}{t}+1.\]
Here, you can make the substitution $y=ut\implies \dfrac{dy}{dt}=u+t\dfrac{du}{dt}$. Thus, you get that
\[u+t\frac{du}{dt}=\frac{ut}{t}+1\implies u+t\frac{du}{dt}=u+1\implies \frac{du}{dt}=\frac{1}{t}.\]
That last differential equation is simple enough to solve.

Can you take things from here?

Ahh, yes. $ \frac{dy}{dx} $ was a nearly-midnight-brain-... Well, it was mis-typed.Piece of cake, thank you very much for your help. The book vaguely suggested doing it this way, but I didn't understand the way it was presented.

$$ \frac{du}{dt} = \frac{1}{t} $$
$$ \int{du} = \int{\frac{1}{t}dt} $$
$$ u = ln|t| + C $$
$$ \frac{y}{t} = ln|t|+C $$
$$ y(t) = tln|t| + tC $$

Thanks again,
Mac
 
Last edited:
MacLaddy said:
Ahh, yes. $ \frac{dy}{dx} $ was a nearly-midnight-brain-... Well, it was mis-typed.Piece of cake, thank you very much for your help. The book vaguely suggested doing it this way, but I didn't understand the way it was presented.

$$ \frac{du}{dt} = \frac{1}{t} $$
$$ \int{du} = \int{\frac{1}{t}dt} $$
$$ u = ln|t| + C $$
$$ \frac{y}{t} = ln|t|+C $$
$$ y(t) = tln|t| + tC $$

Thanks again,
Mac

Yea, some books don't explain it that well. However, $y=ut$ is one of the more common substitutions made when solving first order ODES, so I'd be sure to be familiar with/remember it! :)
 
The motivation for using Chris's substitution comes about from one of the standard forms:
\begin{align*}
\frac{dy}{dt} &= \frac{y+t}{t}\\
t \, dy&=(y+t) \, dt.
\end{align*}
From here, you can see that the differential equation is homogeneous, thus making Chris's substitution the preferred method of solution.

Another method would be the integrating factor, since the equation is first-order linear.
 
I have the equation ##F^x=m\frac {d}{dt}(\gamma v^x)##, where ##\gamma## is the Lorentz factor, and ##x## is a superscript, not an exponent. In my textbook the solution is given as ##\frac {F^x}{m}t=\frac {v^x}{\sqrt {1-v^{x^2}/c^2}}##. What bothers me is, when I separate the variables I get ##\frac {F^x}{m}dt=d(\gamma v^x)##. Can I simply consider ##d(\gamma v^x)## the variable of integration without any further considerations? Can I simply make the substitution ##\gamma v^x = u## and then...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
699
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
845
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K