MHB Can You Tackle the Subset Chain Challenge in Math?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Euge
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion presents a mathematical problem involving a chain of subsets from a nonempty set of n elements. The challenge is to prove a specific relationship between the cardinalities of the subsets in the chain and a positive integer k, which must be at least 2 log n. Despite the complexity of the problem, no participants have provided answers or solutions. The original poster has shared their own solution for reference. Engaging with this problem could enhance understanding of set theory and logarithmic relationships in mathematics.
Euge
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
2,072
Reaction score
245
Here is this week's POTW:

-----
Let $X$ be a nonempty set of $n$ elements. Suppose $\emptyset \neq S_0 \subset S_1 \subset S_2\subset \cdots$ be a chain of subsets of $X$. Prove that to every positive integer $k \ge 2\log n$, there corresponds an index $j\in \{1,\ldots, k\}$ such that $$\operatorname{card}(S_j - S_{j-1}) \le \frac{2\operatorname{card}(S_{j-1})}{k}\log n$$

[Note: The logarithm here is the natural logarithm.]
-----

Remember to read the https://mathhelpboards.com/showthread.php?772-Problem-of-the-Week-%28POTW%29-Procedure-and-Guidelines to find out how to https://mathhelpboards.com/forms.php?do=form&fid=2!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No one answered this week's problem. You can read my solution below.

If the result does not hold, then there exists an integer $k \ge 2\log n$ such that for all indices $j \in \{1,\ldots, k\}$, $$\operatorname{card}(S_j - S_{j-1}) > \frac{2\operatorname{card}(S_{j-1}}{k}\log n$$ Since $\operatorname{card}(S_j - S_{j-1}) = \operatorname{card}(S_j) - \operatorname{card}(S_{j-1})$, equivalently $$\operatorname{card}(S_j) > \left(1 + \frac{2}{k}\log n\right)\operatorname{card}(S_{j-1})$$ By the inequality $1 + 2x \ge e^x$ for all $x\in [0,1]$, it follows that for every $j$, $\operatorname{card}(S_j) > n^{1/k} \operatorname{card}(S_{j-1})$. Inductively, $\operatorname{card}(S_j) > n^{j/k}\operatorname{card}(S_0) \ge n^{j/k}$ for all $j$. In particular $\operatorname{card}(S_k) > n$, a contradiction.