Can you unscramble a scrambled egg?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the Stern-Gerlach (SG) experiment and its implications when conducted with a uniform magnetic field. Participants analyze the behavior of polarized electron beams, concluding that splitting and recombining beams does not unscramble the electrons but rather results in a 50-50 distribution of spins. The conversation highlights the importance of maintaining coherence in quantum states to distinguish between original and altered states, emphasizing the counterintuitive nature of quantum mechanics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Stern-Gerlach experiment and its principles
  • Familiarity with quantum mechanics terminology, particularly spin and polarization
  • Knowledge of quantum state coherence and superposition
  • Basic concepts of beam splitting and recombination using polarizing filters
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of quantum coherence in the Stern-Gerlach experiment
  • Explore the mathematical foundations of spin states and their probabilities
  • Investigate experiments using birefringent materials for beam splitting
  • Learn about the role of polarizing filters in quantum optics
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and researchers interested in the behavior of polarized particles and quantum state manipulation.

Swamp Thing
Insights Author
Messages
1,047
Reaction score
785
Here is a fascinating article about the story of the landmark SG Experiment.

http://www.physicstoday.org/vol-56/iss-12/p53.html

There are some interesting twists to the tale, but I won't spoil them for you.

Some contemporary reactions to the results:-
http://www.physicstoday.org/vol-56/iss-12/captions/p53box1.html

Cheers,
S.T.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Question about SGE

What if we do a S-G experiment with a uniform magnetic field?

Each atom will still have to "decide" to point up or down, only we won't be able to tell them apart at the output of the apparatus because there will be no vertical deflection. Now, is this not a different situation from the input beam? At the input, (if I understand correctly) each atom is essentially "unpolarized" i.e. in a 50-50 superposition of both states. At the output, we have a 50-50 mixture where each individual atom is definitely "up" or "down".

My questions:
(a)is the above reasoning correct

(b) if so, is there an experiment that we can do to distinguish a beam that has been "combed out" by a uniform magnetic field, from a beam that has not passed through any field.
 


Originally posted by Swamp Thing
What if we do a S-G experiment with a uniform magnetic field?

Each atom will still have to "decide" to point up or down, only we won't be able to tell them apart at the output of the apparatus because there will be no vertical deflection. Now, is this not a different situation from the input beam? At the input, (if I understand correctly) each atom is essentially "unpolarized" i.e. in a 50-50 superposition of both states. At the output, we have a 50-50 mixture where each individual atom is definitely "up" or "down".

My questions:
(a)is the above reasoning correct

(b) if so, is there an experiment that we can do to distinguish a beam that has been "combed out" by a uniform magnetic field, from a beam that has not passed through any field.

I'm not a QM guru, so this won't be very specific:

Let's say we have a beam of electrons that's been polarized s.t. all spins are pointing up at orientation 0. Then if we slap a detector at an angle of θ to 0, then the probability of getting an electron with spin up orientation θ is cos(θ/2)2.
The probability for the other orientation from the 'combed pair' is cos((π-θ)/2)2=sin(θ/2)2
So, along any orientation, you would still get a 50-50 distribution of spins since you get .5*(sin2+cos2) probability of spin up.

So the splitting and recombining does not unscramble the electrons. In fact it scrambles them. You can do the following:

Let's say we've got a beam of electrons that is all spin-up in orientation 0. Now, if we split it into beams along orienation π/4, and then recombine it, we will get a beam with a 50-50 orientation split along spin orientation 0.
 
Oh, there's a nice easy experiment for you to check this.
It takes 3 polarizing filters and a light source.

Take the two polarizing filters, and line them up so their polarization is perpendicular. You should get almost no light coming through.

Now, if you put the third filter between them, you'll get *more* light coming through from before.

Analagous experiments are , I believe, possible with birefringent materials such as calcite, which can act as a beam splitters instead of eliminating a particular polarization.
 


Originally posted by NateTG
So the splitting and recombining does not unscramble the electrons. In fact it scrambles them. You can do the following:

Let's say we've got a beam of electrons that is all spin-up in orientation 0. Now, if we split it into beams along orienation π/4, and then recombine it, we will get a beam with a 50-50 orientation split along spin orientation 0.
I'm not exactly sure what you are saying, but you can certainly recombine the exit beams of a SG magnet by putting them through a second (reversed) SG. If you can maintain the coherence of the beams, you will not be able to distinguish the final beam from the original: it will be in its original pure state. That's (part of) what's weird about this stuff.