Can you work out power without knowing displacement?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the power of a bike traveling up an inclined plane at a constant speed, with given mass, friction, and speed, but lacking displacement. Participants explore how to approach the problem without directly knowing displacement, raising questions about the relationships between power, force, and velocity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between power, work, and force, with some suggesting that power can be expressed in terms of force and velocity. Others question how to calculate the net force and whether conversions between units are necessary for calculations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights into the relationships between forces acting on the bike and the conditions for equilibrium. There is an ongoing exploration of how to apply these concepts to determine the cyclist's applied force and the implications for power calculation.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express confusion about the implications of a net force of zero and the distinction between net power output and the power output of the cyclist. The need for unit conversion for consistent calculations is also noted.

jjones1573
Messages
22
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I'm a bit confused by a question asking me to work out the power of a bike traveling up an inclined plane with a constant speed. I have the mass and friction and the speed but no displacement so I don't know how I could work out power if to find the work I need to factor in displacement to the equation. Any ideas?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Power is W/t, and work is F.d, thus P = F.(d/t).
 
Power can be found in terms of force and velocity; iff both are constant: P = Fv
 
Ah ok great!
 
So If the bike is moving up at a constant speed with a friction force of 320N, to calculate the net force do I simply do mg Sin theta - 700?

Also when working interms of km/h do we need to convert to m/s to do the calculations?
 
jjones1573 said:
So If the bike is moving up at a constant speed with a friction force of 320N, to calculate the net force do I simply do mg Sin theta - 700?

Also when working interms of km/h do we need to convert to m/s to do the calculations?

The speed is constant, so you know that the net force is zero. Therefore, whatever force is being applied by the cyclist is being countered by friction and by the component of the weight parallel to the incline. In other words, the sum of all forces acting parallel to the incline is 0. You can use this force balance equation to solve for what the cyclist's applied force has to be.

Draw a free body diagram for the bike if you're having trouble keeping track of the forces.

Yes, you have to convert to m/s IF you want your answer to be in watts (N*m / s). If you don't, then your answer will be in (N*km/h), which is still a unit of power, but is not the standard one (the watt).
 
Ah ok thank you. so if the sum of all the forces parallel equals zero then perpundicular forces also cancel each other out then the net force is 0? I am still a little confused.
 
Yes exactly. Let's just use tilted coordinate axes so that parallel to the incline is the x direction and perpendicular is the y direction. Then the condition for equilibrium gives you two equations 1. Sum of all forces in x-direction = 0
2. Sum of all forces in y direction = 0.

These two equations allow you to solve for your unknowns (friction, normal force) in terms of your knowns (mass, g, friction coefficient).
 
jjones1573 said:

Homework Statement



I'm a bit confused by a question asking me to work out the power of a bike traveling up an inclined plane with a constant speed. I have the mass and friction and the speed but no displacement so I don't know how I could work out power if to find the work I need to factor in displacement to the equation. Any ideas?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Think about the definition of velocity. What is in the numerator?
 
  • #10
v = d/t

ahh I see what your saying that's why P = F.(d/t) or P = F.V because V = d/t of course!


But I'm still confused about the force calculation. if the net force is 0 then the power from the above equation p = 0 * velocity = 0
but that can't be right?
 
Last edited:
  • #11
jjones1573 said:
v = d/t

ahh I see what your saying that's why P = F.(d/t) or P = F.V because V = d/t of course!


But I'm still confused about the force calculation. if the net force is 0 then the power from the above equation p = 0 * velocity = 0
but that can't be right?

It's true that there is no net work being done, and hence no net power output. Any power generated by the cyclist is 1. dissipated as heat due to friction OR 2. used up to increase the gravitational potential energy of the bike as it goes up the incline.

But the question is not asking you to compute the net power output. It is asking you to compute the power output of the cyclist. So don't use the net force in P = F*v. Use the applied force of the cyclist.

That's why you have to go through this whole rigamarole of applying the condition for static equilibrium and force balance -- to determine what force the cyclist has to apply to keep the bike moving.
 
  • #12
Ah ok thank you for taking the time to explain this that makes complete sense now!
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 56 ·
2
Replies
56
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
25
Views
3K