Cannot understand this corollary on surreal numbers

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Anixx
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Continuum Set
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on Corollary B from a paper regarding surreal numbers and their relationship to Hardy fields under the assumption of the Continuum Hypothesis (CH). It establishes that every maximal Hardy field is isomorphic as an ordered differential field to the ordered field No(ω1) of surreal numbers of countable length. The corollary implies that there are no countable surreal numbers greater than the germs of Hardy fields, clarifying the structure and limitations of surreal numbers in this context.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of surreal numbers and their properties
  • Familiarity with Hardy fields and their applications
  • Knowledge of the Continuum Hypothesis (CH)
  • Basic concepts of ordered differential fields
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of the Continuum Hypothesis on surreal numbers
  • Study the structure of Hardy fields and their isomorphisms
  • Explore ordered differential fields and their characteristics
  • Examine advanced topics in set theory related to countable and uncountable sets
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, logicians, and students of advanced mathematics focusing on set theory, surreal numbers, and differential fields.

Anixx
Messages
88
Reaction score
11
I cannot understand a corollary from this paper on surreal numbers:

Corollary B. Assuming CH (the Continuum Hypothesis), every maximal Hardy
field is isomorphic as an ordered differential field to the ordered field No(ω1) of
surreal numbers of countable length

Does it say that there are no countable surreal numbers greater than the germs of Hardy fields?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
11K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
11K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K