Canonical form derivation of (L1'AL1)

In summary, the conversation discusses the understanding of the equation L'AL = Λ and the reason for taking γΛγ1 = Σy2λ = 1. The person also mentions resolving a problem with a blurred picture and explains that y'Δy is the result of multiplying the transpose of vector components of y with a symmetric matrix Δ. The conversation ends with a thank you.
  • #1
Sanchayan Ghosh
11
0
Hello everyone,

I actually had a problem with understanding the part where they have defined L'AL = Λ. There, they have taken
γΛγ1 = Σy2λ = 1. Why have they taken that? Is it arbitary or does it come as a result of a derivation?
Screenshot_2018-09-15-15-16-14-1646668577.png

Thank you
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_2018-09-15-15-16-14-1646668577.png
    Screenshot_2018-09-15-15-16-14-1646668577.png
    16.6 KB · Views: 662
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
sorry, we cannot see the picture
 
  • #3
I don't know why it got blurred. Actually I resolved the problem.
y'Δy is nothing but mitiplying the transpose of vector components of y with the symmetric matrix
Δ = L'1AL1
L is the 1x3 matrix of eigen values of a symmetric matrix A.
And then multiplying the result with y vector. This gives the above expression as I had asked.

Thank you.
 

1. What is the purpose of deriving the canonical form of L1'AL1?

The canonical form of L1'AL1 is derived in order to simplify and standardize the representation of the language, making it easier to analyze and understand. It also allows for easier comparison and combination with other languages.

2. How is the canonical form of L1'AL1 derived?

The canonical form of L1'AL1 is derived using a series of transformations, such as removing duplicate symbols and simplifying expressions, until a unique and simplified form is obtained.

3. What are the benefits of using the canonical form of L1'AL1?

Using the canonical form of L1'AL1 allows for easier analysis and manipulation of the language, as well as making it more compatible with other languages. It also helps to identify patterns and similarities within the language.

4. Can the canonical form of L1'AL1 be derived for any language?

Yes, the canonical form can be derived for any language, as long as it follows a well-defined grammar and syntax.

5. How does the canonical form of L1'AL1 differ from other forms of representation?

The canonical form of L1'AL1 is unique and simplified, while other forms of representation may vary depending on the context and purpose. It also allows for easier comparison and analysis of the language.

Similar threads

I Canonical Form for quadratic equations *with* linear terms
    • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
4
Views
2K
I Want to understand how to express the derivative as a matrix
    • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
8
Views
1K
A Elementwise Derivative of a Matrix Exponential
    • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
2
Views
2K
MHB How do you find frobenius canonical form of a matrix?
    • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
1
Views
2K
I Derivation of the Canonical Ensemble
    • Thermodynamics
Replies
3
Views
864
Control Theory: Derivation of Controllable Canonical Form
    • General Engineering
Replies
3
Views
2K
I How to study an ODE in matrix form in a Hilbert space?
    • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
6
Views
1K
I Proof that if T is Hermitian, eigenvectors form an orthonormal basis
    • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
3
Views
2K
MHB Normal Form and Canonical Form of a Quadratic
    • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
20
Views
18K
I How can the dual tensors derivation be achieved using rotation matrices?
    • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
4
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top