Capacitive Reactance: Calculate Xc & V=I*Xc

  • Thread starter Thread starter Devil Moo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Reactance
Click For Summary
In an AC circuit with a pure capacitor, the voltage and current can be expressed as Vc = V0 * sin(w*t) and I = wCV0 * sin(wt), leading to the capacitive reactance formula Xc = 1/(wC). The discussion clarifies that the equation V = I * Xc applies to amplitude or RMS values rather than instantaneous values. It also highlights that complex numbers are not strictly necessary unless considering phase differences, where the introduction of imaginary numbers helps describe the phase relationship using e^(i*theta). The conversation emphasizes the distinction between real and complex representations in AC circuit analysis. Understanding these concepts is essential for accurate calculations in capacitive circuits.
Devil Moo
Messages
44
Reaction score
1
Hi,

A pure capacitor C is in an a.c. circuit.

Vc = V0 * sin(w*t)
Q = C * Vc
= C * V0 * sin(w*t)
I = dQ/dt
= wCV0 sin(wt)
then I0 = wCV0
Xc = V0 / I0 = 1/(wC)

So why people would say V = I * Xc?

Is it a must to include complex number?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The derivative of sin is cos.

You don't need complex numbers.
 
Whoops!
I = I0 cos(wt)
Then V = I * Xc * tan(wt)
not V = I * Xc
 
The relationship V=I*Xc (with real numbers) is between the amplitudes or rms values and not between instantaneous values.
Otherwise you need to consider Xc as a complex number, to take into account the phase difference between v and i.
 
But why do we introduce imaginary root in it?
Is it used to describe the phase based on the e^(i*theta)?
 
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K