Cardinality of Complex vs. Real

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Parth Dave
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cardinality Complex
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion establishes that the set of complex numbers has the same cardinality as the set of real numbers by demonstrating a bijection between the two. The transformation from complex numbers in the form of a + bi to ordered pairs (a, b) allows for a one-to-one correspondence with real numbers. The conversation highlights the importance of addressing ambiguous representations, such as 0.5 and 0.4999..., which can lead to misconceptions. Ultimately, it concludes that both the real numbers and complex numbers share the same cardinality as the Cartesian plane.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of set theory and cardinality
  • Familiarity with complex numbers and their representation
  • Knowledge of real numbers and their decimal representations
  • Basic concepts of bijections and injections in mathematics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the concept of bijections in set theory
  • Explore the properties of real numbers and their decimal representations
  • Learn about the Cartesian plane and its relationship with complex numbers
  • Investigate the implications of ambiguous number representations in mathematics
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of set theory, and anyone interested in understanding the relationships between different number sets, particularly complex and real numbers.

Parth Dave
Messages
298
Reaction score
0
Prove that the set of complex numbers has the same cardinality as the reals.

What I did was say that a + bi can be written as (a, b) where a, b belong to real. Which essentially means i have to create a bijection between (a, b) and z (where z belongs to real).

Suppose:
a = 0.a1a2a3a4a5...
b = 0.b1b2b3b4b5...

Then,

z = 0.a1b1a2b2a3b3...

Is there anything wrong with that?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to do a little more work. First, does that constitute a one to one correspondence between the reals and the complex numbers? Also, you need to deal with ambiguous representations of certain numbers such as 0.5 and 0.4999...
 
Well essentially that shows that there is a one to one relationship between the reals and the cartesian plane (x, y). Also, there is a one to one relationship between complex and the cartesian plane. Thus, the cardinality for all 3 is the same.

Pertaining to the ambiguosity of certain number, I'm not sure if i see how they pose a problem because if x is 0.5 or 0.499999 you get a different result.

ps. pardon my ignorance. I just started set/number theory two days ago :-p .
 
Parth Dave said:
Well essentially that shows that there is a one to one relationship between the reals and the cartesian plane (x, y). Also, there is a one to one relationship between complex and the cartesian plane. Thus, the cardinality for all 3 is the same.

Pertaining to the ambiguosity of certain number, I'm not sure if i see how they pose a problem because if x is 0.5 or 0.499999 you get a different result.

The problem is that 0.5 and 0.4\bar 9 are the same number and lead to different results!
 
he only needs an injection from the complexes to the reals, since there is an inclusion the other way, and if he assumes his reals are finite or infinite decimals not ending in all 9's, then his map never sends any pair of reals to a decimal ending in all 9's. so he does get an injection.
 
Tide said:
The problem is that 0.5 and 0.4\bar 9 are the same number and lead to different results!

There is no real number 4.9999...
4.99... and 5 are just two metha-variables to denote the number 5 in R .Here denote means "interpretation." .
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
10K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
8K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K