Cauchy-Riemann Condition Verification for f(z) = z^3-5iz+√7

  • Thread starter Thread starter chwala
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Condition
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around verifying that the function f(z) = z^3 - 5iz + √7 satisfies the Cauchy-Riemann equations. Participants confirm that the calculations show both sides of the equations hold true, indicating the function meets the criteria. There is a suggestion to explore alternative methods, such as expressing f in terms of z and its conjugate, but direct verification is emphasized as the most straightforward approach. The conversation also touches on the harmonic condition, noting it is necessary but not sufficient for satisfying the Cauchy-Riemann equations. Overall, the verification process is affirmed, with a focus on the principles governing the equations.
chwala
Gold Member
Messages
2,827
Reaction score
415

Homework Statement


Verify ## f(z)= z^3-5iz+√7## satisfies cauchy riemann equations.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


seeking alternative method
## f(z)= (x^3+5y-3xy^2+√7)+ (3x^2y-y^3-5x)i##
##∂u/∂x = 3x^2-3y^2 = ∂v/∂y##
##∂v/∂x=6xy-5= -∂u/dy##
hence satisfies.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
Your attempt appears correct. What was your question?
 
chwala said:

Homework Statement


Verify ## f(z)= z^3-5iz+√7## satisfies cauchy riemann equations.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


seeking alternative method
Why? Is there some reason that the work below isn't satisfactory?
chwala said:
## f(z)= (x^3+5y-3xy^2+√7)+ (3x^2y-y^3-5x)i##
##∂u/∂x = 3x^2-3y^2 = ∂v/∂y##
##∂v/∂x=6xy-5= -∂u/dy##
hence satisfies.
 
  • Like
Likes chwala
chwala said:
seeking alternative method

If you think about expressing ##f=u+iv## in terms of ##z## and ##\bar{z}## instead of ##x## and ##y##, it's easy to show that the CR equations say that ##\frac{\partial{f}}{\partial{\bar{z}}}=0##. So any function that depends only on ##z## will satisfy CR.
 
  • Like
Likes FactChecker
There is a simple way to see it immediately if you know that the sums and products of functions that satisfy CR also satisfy CR. Constants and f(z)=z satisfy CR. Your equation is a combination of sums and products satisfying CR, so it also satisfies CR.
 
  • Like
Likes chwala
Mark44 said:
Why? Is there some reason that the work below isn't satisfactory?
why? i have shown that both sides of the cauchy riemann pde hold. that's a summary of my working, or you want to see the full working?
 
FactChecker said:
There is a simple way to see it immediately if you know that the sums and products of functions that satisfy CR also satisfy CR. Constants and f(z)=z satisfy CR. Your equation is a combination of sums and products satisfying CR, so it also satisfies CR.
thats exactly what i did. i substituted for ##z=x+iy##
 
jambaugh said:
Your attempt appears correct. What was your question?
My method is correct, its not an attempt. I was proving or rather to show that the given ##f(z)## satisfies the Cauchy Riemann equations. I am simply asking for alternative ways of solving. regards,
 
Well as the Cauchy Riemann conditions are directly verifiable there's not much else you can do but directly verify them. There are consequential conditions like the harmonic condition:
\Delta u = \Delta v = 0
but while this is a necessary condition it is not sufficient. It may be satisfied for functions failing to satisfy CR.
[edit: oops for the typo... now corrected.]
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes chwala
  • #10
jambaugh said:
Well as the Cauchy Riemann conditions are directly verifiable there's not much else you can do but directly verify them. There are consequential conditions like the harmonic condition:
\Delt u = \Delta v = 0
but while this is a necessary condition it is not sufficient. It may be satisfied for functions failing to satisfy CR.
...directly verifiable...thank you.
 
  • #11
chwala said:
thats exactly what i did. i substituted for ##z=x+iy##
What you did is not the same as applying general principles. You don't have to do the messy calculations if the principles have been proven. You have to have proven the principle that sums and multiplications of functions satisfying CR will also satisfy CR. Then just state that your function is a combination of sums and multiplications of simple functions satisfying CR and apply the principle.
 
  • Like
Likes chwala
  • #12
chwala said:
why? i have shown that both sides of the cauchy riemann pde hold. that's a summary of my working, or you want to see the full working?
kindly note pde means partial differential equations...just for clarity
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K