CDF ZZ Event Display: Lepton 1 Ambiguity

  • Thread starter Thread starter touqra
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cdf Lepton
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the ambiguity of lepton identification in the CDF event display for ZZ production, specifically regarding lepton 1, which may be classified as either an electron or a muon. The identification process relies on calorimeter depositions for electrons and muon chambers for muons. The presence of additional debris from the ppbar collision can lead to misidentification, as energy deposits may falsely indicate an electron presence. The ambiguity is further compounded by the possibility of a muon not registering hits in the muon chambers, thus necessitating the use of the label e/mu to account for both hypotheses.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of CDF (Collider Detector at Fermilab) event displays
  • Knowledge of particle identification techniques, specifically for electrons and muons
  • Familiarity with calorimeter and muon chamber functionalities
  • Basic concepts of ppbar collisions and their implications in particle physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research CDF electron identification techniques and their methodologies
  • Explore the role of calorimeters in particle detection and energy deposition analysis
  • Study the implications of background events in particle physics, particularly concerning b quark fragmentation
  • Learn about the significance of neutral pions in calorimeter signals and their decay processes
USEFUL FOR

Particle physicists, researchers in experimental physics, and students studying particle detection methods will benefit from this discussion, particularly those focused on lepton identification and event analysis in high-energy collisions.

touqra
Messages
284
Reaction score
0
I was looking at this event display from CDF on their discovery of ZZ production. Why is lepton 1 having an ambiguity of either an electron or muon ?
http://fcdfwww.fnal.gov/physics/ewk/2007/ZZ/evd/r211311_e233113.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know the details of CDF electron identification, but I assume electrons are id'd based on calorimeter depositions, while muons depend on the muon chambers. If so, then the extra "debris" from the ppbar collision could have deposited enough energy in the calorimeter to pass the electron id. It is also possible that they are using this candidate even when one muon did not leave hits on the muon chambers (maybe went through a region without detector elements), in an attempt to increase the number of candidates on their sample.
 
Probably they label it e/mu because it is consistent both with the electron hypothesis (since it leaves some energy in the electromagnetic calorimeter, see the purple block) and with the muon hypothesis (since it has hits in the muon chambers).

My 2 cents: it is a muon which by chance is superimposed to a jet(*). There are three quite stiff tracks pointing in the same directions, which could justify the presence of a signal in the hadronic calorimeter (see the blue block over the purple block), and if it is a jet it's probable that you also have some neutral pions; neutral pions don't leave tracks but they decay into photons, and so give signal in the electromagnetic calorimeter.

(*) or maybe a jet from the fragmentation of a b quark, with the B meson decaying muonically. In this case this event would belong to the background and not to the signal.
 
Last edited:
ops, I essentially repeated the answer by ahrkron.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
15K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K