CDF ZZ Event Display: Lepton 1 Ambiguity

  • Thread starter Thread starter touqra
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cdf Lepton
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the ambiguity of lepton 1 in the CDF ZZ event display, which could be identified as either an electron or a muon. This uncertainty arises because electron identification relies on calorimeter energy deposits, while muon identification depends on hits in muon chambers. The presence of additional collision debris may have caused enough energy deposition in the calorimeter to misidentify a muon as an electron. Furthermore, if a muon did not register hits in the muon chambers, it might still be considered a candidate to increase sample size. The event is labeled e/mu due to its compatibility with both identification hypotheses.
touqra
Messages
284
Reaction score
0
I was looking at this event display from CDF on their discovery of ZZ production. Why is lepton 1 having an ambiguity of either an electron or muon ?
http://fcdfwww.fnal.gov/physics/ewk/2007/ZZ/evd/r211311_e233113.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know the details of CDF electron identification, but I assume electrons are id'd based on calorimeter depositions, while muons depend on the muon chambers. If so, then the extra "debris" from the ppbar collision could have deposited enough energy in the calorimeter to pass the electron id. It is also possible that they are using this candidate even when one muon did not leave hits on the muon chambers (maybe went through a region without detector elements), in an attempt to increase the number of candidates on their sample.
 
Probably they label it e/mu because it is consistent both with the electron hypothesis (since it leaves some energy in the electromagnetic calorimeter, see the purple block) and with the muon hypothesis (since it has hits in the muon chambers).

My 2 cents: it is a muon which by chance is superimposed to a jet(*). There are three quite stiff tracks pointing in the same directions, which could justify the presence of a signal in the hadronic calorimeter (see the blue block over the purple block), and if it is a jet it's probable that you also have some neutral pions; neutral pions don't leave tracks but they decay into photons, and so give signal in the electromagnetic calorimeter.

(*) or maybe a jet from the fragmentation of a b quark, with the B meson decaying muonically. In this case this event would belong to the background and not to the signal.
 
Last edited:
ops, I essentially repeated the answer by ahrkron.
 
Theoretical physicist C.N. Yang died at the age of 103 years on October 18, 2025. He is the Yang in Yang-Mills theory, which he and his collaborators devised in 1953, which is a generic quantum field theory that is used by scientists to study amplitudes (i.e. vector probabilities) that are foundational in all Standard Model processes and most quantum gravity theories. He also won a Nobel prize in 1957 for his work on CP violation. (I didn't see the post in General Discussions at PF on his...

Similar threads

Replies
30
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
15K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K