MHB Challenge Problem #6: Prove tan 18°=√(1-2/√5)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Olinguito
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Challenge Tan
Olinguito
Messages
239
Reaction score
0
Prove that
$$\tan18^\circ\ =\ \sqrt{1-\dfrac2{\sqrt5}}.$$
No calculator, computer program, Excel, Google, or any other kind of cheating tool allowed. (Smirk)

Have fun!
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It's true. Proof: It's intuitively obvious.

-Dan
 
Olinguito said:
Prove that
$$\tan18^\circ\ =\ \sqrt{1-\dfrac2{\sqrt5}}.$$
No calculator, computer program, Excel, Google, or any other kind of cheating tool allowed. (Smirk)

[sp]This comes from the geometry of the pentagon.
[TIKZ][scale=0.75]
\coordinate [label=above: $C$] (C) at (90:5cm) ;
\coordinate [label=above right: $D$] (D) at (18:5cm) ;
\coordinate [label=above left: $B$] (B) at (162:5cm) ;
\coordinate [label=below: $A$] (A) at (234:5cm) ;
\coordinate [label=below: $E$] (E) at (306:5cm) ;
\coordinate [label=below: $P$] (P) at (-4.755,-4.045) ;
\coordinate [label=below: $R$] (R) at (4.755,-4.045) ;
\coordinate [label=above right: $Q$] (Q) at (0.45,0.6) ;
\draw (A) -- node
{$1$} (B) -- node[above left] {$1$} (C) -- node[above right] {$1$} (D) -- node
{$1$} (E) -- node[below] {$1$} (A) -- (P) -- (B) -- (D) -- (R) -- (E) ;
\draw (C) -- (E) -- node[above right] {$d$}(B) ;
\draw (-3.4,-3.75) node {$72^\circ$} ;[/TIKZ]
If $ABCDE$ is a regular pentagon with side $1$ then it is a standard result that the diagonals have length $d = \frac12(\sqrt5+1)$, the golden ratio. A quick way to see that is to notice that in the above diagram the triangles $CQD$ and $BQE$ are similar (with angles $36^\circ$ and $108^\circ$), from which $QD = \frac1d$. Then $BD = BQ+QD$, so that $d = 1 + \frac1d$, a quadratic equation whose positive root is the golden ratio.

If $BP$ and $DR$ are the perpendiculars from $B$ and $D$ to $AE$ then $d = PR = PA + AE + ER = 1+2PA$, from which $PA = \frac12(d-1) = \frac14(\sqrt5-1)$.

By Pythagoras in the triangle $BPA$, $BP^2 = 1 - \frac1{16}(\sqrt5-1)^2 = \frac18(5+\sqrt5)$. Therefore $$\frac{PA^2}{BP^2} = \frac{\frac18(3-\sqrt5)}{\frac18(5+\sqrt5)} = \frac{(3-\sqrt5)(5-\sqrt5)}{(5+\sqrt5)(5-\sqrt5)} = \frac{20-8\sqrt5}{20} = 1 - \frac2{\sqrt5}.$$ But $\frac{PA}{BP} = \tan 18^\circ$, and therefore $\tan 18^\circ = \sqrt{1 - \frac2{\sqrt5}}.$

[/sp]​
 
Last edited:
Thanks, Opalg! It’s a neat geometric solution. (Clapping)

My own solution is entirely analytic. (Nerd)

Consider $\tan54^\circ$. On the one hand:
$$\tan54^\circ\ =\ \frac1{\tan36^\circ}\ =\ \frac{1-\tan^218^\circ}{2\tan18^\circ}.$$
On the other hand:
$$\tan54^\circ\ =\ \tan3(18)^\circ\ =\ \frac{3\tan18^\circ-\tan^318^\circ}{1-3\tan^218^\circ}$$
using the triple-angle formula for tangent. Hence:
$$\frac{1-\tan^218^\circ}{2\tan18^\circ}\ =\ \frac{3\tan18^\circ-\tan^318^\circ}{1-3\tan^218^\circ}$$
$\implies\ 1-4\tan^218^\circ+3\tan^418^\circ\ =\ 6\tan^218^\circ-2\tan^418^\circ$

$\implies\ 5\tan^418^\circ-10\tan^218^\circ+1\ =\ 0$

$\implies$ $\tan^218^\circ$ is a root of the quadratic equation $f(x)=5x^2-10x+1=0$

$\implies\ \tan^218^\circ=\dfrac{10\pm\sqrt{80}}{10}=1\pm\dfrac2{\sqrt5}.$

But $f(1)=-4<0$ and $f(2)=1>0$ showing that there is a root between $1$ and $2$. This root can’t be $\tan^218^\circ$ as $0<\tan18^\circ<1$. It follows that $\tan^218^\circ$ is the lesser of the two possible roots, i.e.
$$\tan^218^\circ\ =\ 1-\frac2{\sqrt5}$$
and we are done. (Cool) (The other root turns out to be $\tan^254^\circ$.)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top