Change in orbit when mass is doubled

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

When a planet's mass doubles, the orbit of a satellite changes from a circular to an elliptical shape. The major axis of the new orbit equals the original radius, while the minor axis adjusts to approximately 127,592 km, with the pericenter shifting to 73,820 km and the semi-major axis becoming 147,135 km. The vis-viva equation is essential for calculating the new orbital parameters. This analysis was supported by simulations in Universe Sandbox.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of orbital mechanics
  • Familiarity with the vis-viva equation
  • Knowledge of elliptical orbits
  • Experience with simulation tools like Universe Sandbox
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the vis-viva equation for two-body orbits
  • Explore the dynamics of elliptical orbits
  • Investigate the effects of mass changes on orbital mechanics
  • Experiment with Universe Sandbox to simulate various orbital scenarios
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysicists, and students of physics interested in orbital dynamics and simulation-based learning.

Muu9
Messages
332
Reaction score
232
TL;DR
What happens to the once-circular orbit of a satellite when it's planet's mass suddenly doubles?
A satellite is orbiting a planet in a circular orbit. The planet's mass doubles instantly. What happens to the orbit of the satellite?

I think it would move to an elliptical orbit with major axis equal to the old radius and a minor axis equal to either 1/2 or sqrt(2)/2 times the old radius. I'm leaning toward the latter. What do you guys think?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Muu9 said:
What do you guys think?
I think you should do the maths!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark and Filip Larsen
Muu9 said:
I think it would move to an elliptical orbit with major axis equal to the old radius and a minor axis equal to either 1/2 or sqrt(2)/2 times the old radius. I'm leaning toward the latter. What do you guys think?
Nothing would happen*. An object's orbital velocity is independent of its mass.

*As long as we are treating the star as not being affected by the planet's gravity.


Edit: Whoops, I misunderstood the question. The satellite's orbit would obviously change. Exactly how I'm uncertain at the moment.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark and vanhees71
Drakkith said:
Nothing would happen*. An object's orbital velocity is independent of its mass.
But here it is clearly stated it is the massive object that is doubling mass. And technical all mass changes would in principle have some effect, but since the satellite is not given mass I assume the OP question aim for a simple solution that does not involve reduced mass.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark and PeroK
Filip Larsen said:
But here it is clearly stated it is the massive object that is doubling mass. And technical all mass changes would in principle have some effect, but since the satellite is not given mass I assume the OP question aim for a simple solution that does not involve reduced mass.
Oh wow, how did I misunderstand the question so badly?? I've edited my post.
 
  • Care
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
Playing around in Universe Sandbox gave me the following:

1. An object orbiting Earth in a circular orbit at distance of 220,450 km. Semi-major axis, semi-minor axis, pericenter, and apocenter are all 220,450 km.
2. Doubling Earth's mass leaves the apocenter the same but changes the pericenter to 73,820 km, semi-major axis to 147,135 km, and semi-minor axis to 127,592 km.

Dividing the old values by ##\sqrt{2}## or ##2\sqrt{2}## doesn't perfectly equal any of the new values, but they are close, so I don't know if its a rounding error or if the square root of two just doesn't come into play here.
 
The OP hasn't returned with some math yet, but in case a hint is needed allow me to recommend the vis-viva equation which pretty much is the go to equation for most problems involving speed and radial position for two-body orbits.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
13K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K