Changing my physics subfield between Master's and PhD

  • #1
9
0
Hello, dear all. Currently I'm studying MSc in physics hoping to do PhD soon after my graduation. I did my bachelor in Quantum Electrodynamics, and before starting my MSc in physics, I was working as a research assistant in experimental HEP lab, and I thought I wanted to explore other subfields in physics because I liked QFT theory more than experimental HEP at least I thought at the moment.

So my dislike of experimental HEP led me to explore other subfields of physics that are more practical etc. You see there was some escapist mentality. So finding another subfield that reignite my interest in physics was my sole goal. So I'm doing my master's as an explorative instrument to taste different fields, and by doing so I've taken many subfield subjects from biophysics, astrophysics, particle physics, condensed matter and so on. And I thought something related space is fruitful because of recent trends of Mars missions etc.

So I have been aimlessly wandering around till I decided to write my thesis on space plasma physics. This field is not that bad, but right after choosing my thesis I've finally accepted and embraced that I like the fundamental physics and I can spend rest of my life on particle physics/cosmology.

So my question is: is it possible/realistic for me to go back to PhD QFT/Particle physics, even experimental HEP from space plasma physics MSc?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Answers and Replies

  • #2
##\ ##
Short answer: yes ! By all means.
i want to be a scientist.
So you want to make sure you get a PhD. It makes everything a lot easier. You have a broad interest which is good. For a PhD you have to prove you can a) learn new things b) focus to reach cutting edge and c) do independent research. From a PhD you get more options: you can continue in the same direction (often it takes twice as long as a PhD to actually be a specialist), or you can diversify in many ways: a little (from HEP to QFT or astrophysics or IT or nanotechnology, electronics, or whatever). Or diversify a lot (teaching, management, Greenpeace).

You don't have to like HEP to benefit from it! And it seems to me you are well equipped to flourish in some field. Don't stifle your options by planning too much.

##\ ##


##\ ##
 
  • #3
OP: What country are you in now, and in what countries do you plan to apply for your PhD? From your Post #1, my guess is you're not in the US. I think the answer to your question will vary with the university system; so more info will lead to better answers.
 
  • #4
OP: What country are you in now, and in what countries do you plan to apply for your PhD? From your Post #1, my guess is you're not in the US. I think the answer to your question will vary with the university system; so more info will lead to better answers.
Hello, I'm studying in an European country and planning to do my PhD here.
 
  • #5
Hello, I'm studying in an European country and planning to do my PhD here.
You'll get answers of better value if you identify which European country. From previous threads, there are certain policies applicable to multiple European countries, and certain policies specific to individual European countries. You want advice that is relevant to your specific instance.
 
  • #6
You'll get answers of better value if you identify which European country. From previous threads, there are certain policies applicable to multiple European countries, and certain policies specific to individual European countries. You want advice that is relevant to your specific instance.
It's Hungary
 

Suggested for: Changing my physics subfield between Master's and PhD

Replies
21
Views
641
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
27
Views
3K
Replies
22
Views
830
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
766
Back
Top