Chemical Reaction Homework: Balancing Equation for CaCO3 & Al2(SiO3)3

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on balancing the chemical equation for the reaction between calcium carbonate (CaCO3) and aluminum silicate (Al2(SiO3)3) to produce cement components. The initial attempt at balancing the equation was noted, and a corrected version was provided: 4CaCO3 + Al2(SiO3)3 -> CaO + 4CO2 + Al2O3 + 3CaSiO3. Participants confirmed the balanced equation and discussed determining the physical states of reactants and products, suggesting the use of solubility rules and personal experience with states of matter. The conversation highlights the importance of accuracy in chemical equations and understanding physical states in reactions.
kerrwilk
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If limestone (calcium carbonate) and clay (assume aluminum silicate) are mixed together and heated then the result is cement. Cement is a mixture of calcium oxide, carbon dioxide, aluminum oxide, and calcium silicate. These bags can be purchased at any building supplies store. Write the balanced equation for this reaction.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



CaCO3+Al2(SiO3)3 -> CaO+CO2+Al2O3 +CaSiO3

I know I did not balance the equation yet. I just want to make sure I wrote it right before I do. Did I do this part right? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


So far, so good.
 

The Attempt at a Solution




4CaCO3+Al2(SiO3)3 -> CaO+4CO2+Al2O3 +3CaSiO3

Is this right? Also, how do I determine the physical state of each reactant and product? Do I use the solubility rules? Thanks for your help.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Looks good to me. Yes, solubility rules are a good start. Also, we can use a bit of personal experience too--e.g., we know CO2 is a gas at room temperature.
 
We are talking about solid, so solubility rules are a little bit off.
 
Thanks a lot.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top