Choosing between investing or buying now

  • Thread starter Thread starter ainster31
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Investing
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the financial analysis of two conversion kits for gasoline pumps, priced at $900 and $500, with respective lifespans of 10 years and 5 years. The analysis concludes that, when considering a 7% inflation rate and a 10% investment return, the $900 kit is the more cost-effective choice due to its lower present worth (PW) of costs. The calculations demonstrate the importance of factoring in both future replacement costs and the market interest rate, which encompasses inflation. Ultimately, the $500 kit's future costs outweigh its initial savings, making the $900 kit the optimal investment.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of present worth (PW) calculations
  • Familiarity with financial concepts such as future value (F/P) and present value (P/F)
  • Knowledge of inflation rates and their impact on investment decisions
  • Basic principles of investment return rates
NEXT STEPS
  • Study financial analysis techniques for investment decisions
  • Learn about present value and future value calculations in detail
  • Research the impact of inflation on investment returns
  • Explore case studies on equipment leasing and financial decision-making
USEFUL FOR

Finance students, investment analysts, business owners considering equipment purchases, and anyone involved in financial decision-making related to capital investments.

ainster31
Messages
158
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



A group of students decided to lease and run a gasoline service station. The lease is for 10 years. Almost immediately the students were confronted with the need to alter the gasoline pumps to read in litres. The Dayton Company has a conversion kit available for $900 that may be expected to last 10 years. The firm also sells a $500 conversion kit that has a 5-year useful life. The students believe that any money not invested in the conversion kits may be invested elsewhere at a 10% interest rate. Income tax consequences are to be ignored in this problem.
(a) Assuming that future replacement kits cost the same as today, which alternative should be selected?
(b) If one assumes a 7% inflation rate, which alternative should be selected?

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



For part b, here is the solution:

(b) Replacement cost of $500 kit, five years hence
= $500 (F/P, 7%, 5) = $701.5

PW$500 kit = $500 + $701.5 (P/F, 10%, 5) = $935.60
PW$900 kit = $900

To minimize PW of Cost, choose $900 kit.

So, the $500 was converted from 500 current-dollars to 701.50 5-year-future-dollars. Then, the 701.50 5-year-future-dollars was converted to $435.60 current dollars using the 10% interest for the investment but I think they forgot to account for the inflation rate. Instead of using 10%, shouldn't they have used the market rate?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Ah, I get it now. The 10% interest includes the inflation rate because it is the market interest rate which is the combination of the real interest rate and inflation rate.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 96 ·
4
Replies
96
Views
12K
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
8K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
20K
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
25
Views
47K