Circular Motion/Newton's Laws-- Swinging a Pail

  • Thread starter Thread starter in the rye
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circular Laws
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves swinging a pail of water in a vertical circle and determining the minimum speed required at the highest point to prevent the water from spilling. This falls under the subject area of circular motion and Newton's laws.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to analyze the forces acting on the pail, particularly focusing on tension and gravity. They express uncertainty about why setting tension to zero leads to the correct minimum speed. Other participants explore the implications of minimum tension and the relationship between velocity and forces acting on the pail.

Discussion Status

Participants are engaging in a productive dialogue, questioning assumptions about forces and motion. There is an exploration of the relationship between tension, gravity, and the conditions necessary for the water to remain in the pail. Some guidance has been offered regarding the role of normal force and its relation to the forces acting on the water.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the implications of the problem's constraints, such as the definition of "minimum speed" and the effects of varying tension on the system. There is also a discussion about the nature of forces acting on the water and the bucket during the motion.

in the rye
Messages
83
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement


You tie a cord to a pail of water, and you swing the pail in a vertical circle of radius 0.700 m
What minimum speed must you give the pail at the highest point of the circle if no water is to spill from it?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I got the correct answer. 2.62 m/s, but I'm not entirely sure WHY I got the correct answer. So, what I did was I drew a force diagram and labeled all my forces. I got that my my forces in the centripetal direction are Tension (FT) and Gravity (mg). I found no forces in tangential direction.

Setting up my Newtons 2nd Law equation I got:

FT + m g = m a
or
FT + m g = m (v2/r)

When I looked at this I basically used some intuition. I figured since m,g, and r are considered to be constants, the only thing I could do is eliminate my tension force by setting it to 0. This made sense to me to a degree because if I set tension to 0 then only gravity is acting on my water, which meant the right side (ma) would be equal to gravity (mg) to keep the water in place.

However, I'm not really sure why this means I would set tension to 0. I basically tried to imagine if I had complete slack in the chord what would happen, and intuitively my answer made sense. I'm just not sure of the math behind WHY it makes sense. It was more or less a lucky guess with a bit of intuitive inclination on my part. Why did this work out?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Notice what the question said "Minimum"
Imagine having a tension force all right? You will need a bigger velocity to balance things out.
Imagine now decreasing the tension force, as a result the velocity will decrease.
Now set it to 0. The velocity will be much smaller than what it was.
Can you decrease the force of gravity?
So there you have the minimum speed.
 
Last edited:
Biker said:
Notice what the question said "Minimum"
Imagine having a tension force all right? You will need a bigger velocity to balance things out.
Imagine now decreasing the tension force, as a result the velocity will decrease.
Now set it to 0. The velocity will be much smaller than what it was.
Can you decrease the force of gravity?
So there you have the minimum speed.

I kind of see where you're getting. That is, at 0 the chord goes slack. But, how can I ensure the water will stay in the bucket? I guess that's what I'm confused with. If my only force acting on it is the acceleration due to gravity, I'd imagine that the water would fall out (which makes it seem like there's a centrifugal force -- even though I know there isn't).

[edit]

Rethinking the problem, this reminds me of projectile motion a little. If my tension is 0, then my bucket is kind in free fall, keeping the water and everything inside it since EVERYTHING is falling, however, since the velocity is tangential to the circle, it'd have a horizontal velocity giving it a parabolic type motion. Right?

However, when I have a higher tension, the water is staying put because of Newton's first law, correct? That is, it wants to launch horizontally, but the normal force of the bucket on the water is keeping it in place.
 
Last edited:
Yes, and the free fall parabola is tangential to the circular motion at the top, i.e. has the same radius of curvature there.
in the rye said:
However, when I have a higher tension, the water is staying put because of Newton's first law, correct? That is, it wants to launch horizontally, but the normal force of the bucket on the water is keeping it in place.
Nearly right. Which way is that normal force acting?
 
haruspex said:
Yes, and the free fall parabola is tangential to the circular motion at the top, i.e. has the same radius of curvature there.

Nearly right. Which way is that normal force acting?

I guess it'd depend what part we're looking at but I'd imagine it'd be acting downwards at its peak, upwards at its valley, in fact, it seems like the normal force would be centripetal as well assuming the opening of the bucket is always faced towards the center?
 
in the rye said:
I guess it'd depend what part we're looking at but I'd imagine it'd be acting downwards at its peak, upwards at its valley, in fact, it seems like the normal force would be centripetal as well assuming the opening of the bucket is always faced towards the center?
Yes, but you don't need that assumption. The normal force plays the same role for the water that the string plays for the bucket+water. The two forces would be in the ratio of the masses.
My quibble was because you wrote
in the rye said:
it wants to launch horizontally
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
981
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K