Undergrad Clarifying Meaning of a Conditional w/ Quantifiers (∃x)(∀y)(Fyx ⊃ Fyy)

  • Thread starter Thread starter The Head
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conditional
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The logical statement (∃x)(∀y)(Fyx ⊃ Fyy) implies that there exists an individual x such that for all individuals y, if y performs the action F on x, then y also performs the action F on themselves. This interpretation aligns with option (a) presented in the discussion, which states that if any individual does F to x, they also do F to themselves. The alternative interpretation (b) suggests a different structure, indicating that if there is someone liked by everyone, then everyone likes themselves, which is not the case for the original statement.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of first-order logic and quantifiers
  • Familiarity with logical conditionals and implications
  • Basic knowledge of existential and universal quantification
  • Experience with logical statements and their interpretations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of first-order logic and quantifiers in depth
  • Explore the differences between existential and universal quantification
  • Learn about logical implications and their structures
  • Examine examples of conditionals in logical statements for better clarity
USEFUL FOR

Students of logic, philosophers, and anyone interested in understanding the nuances of logical statements and quantifiers.

The Head
Messages
137
Reaction score
2
TL;DR
Interpreting: (∃x)(∀y) (Fyx ⊃ Fyy)
I've been reading a logic book and saw the logical statement below and have been trying to consider its meaning:

(∃x)(∀y) (Fyx ⊃ Fyy)

I keep going back and forth whether this statement is implying:
a) For all things, if they do F to x, then they do F to themselves
-OR-
b) If there's some x that all things do F to, they all do F to themselves

Appreciate any clarification. The conditional is just throwing me off because I'm not sure if the antecedent is guarantees everything is doing an action to some x or if it's just "for each thing" that is doing an action to x.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Interesting question.

I take it to be something like (a).

Consider: (Ay)(Fyc -> Fyy): For any y, if y likes John, then y likes himself. 'likes' is 'F', John is a constant -- c. Informally, this statement says: 'anyone who likes John, also likes himself.' There's no implication that ALL people like John though.

Then your statement is just the existential generalisation on c of the above: there is someone who is such that, anybody who likes him also likes himself. Or 'somebody is liked by only people who like themselves.'

(b) sounds as if you've got a different bracketing in mind and the statement is in fact a conditional: if someone is liked by everyone, then everyone likes themselves:

[(Ex)(Ay)(Fyx)] -> Ay(Fyy)
 
If there are an infinite number of natural numbers, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two natural numbers, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two of those fractions, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two of those fractions, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two of those fractions, and... then that must mean that there are not only infinite infinities, but an infinite number of those infinities. and an infinite number of those...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K